Table 1.
Healthcare workers’ main characteristics (N = 30)
Characteristics | Healthcare Workers N = 30 |
---|---|
Biological Sex | |
Male Female |
18 12 |
Age Category | |
< 30 years 31-40 years 41-50 years 51-60 years > 61 years |
2 2 5 7 14 |
Type of work environment1 | |
Specialised end-of-life centres Psychiatric units/Psychiatric Hospitals Private or Group Practice Psychiatric Care Homes Other |
10 9 5 5 4 |
Background qualifications2 | |
Psychiatrists General Practitioners (Secretary) consultants at end-of-life centres3 Psychiatric nurses Psychologists Moral Consultants/Spiritual Caregivers Buddies Social Workers Experts by experience4 Specialist Physicians (other than psychiatrists) Other |
10 5 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 4 |
Number of concrete experiences in the year prior to the interview5 | |
1–2 cases 3–5 cases > 5 cases |
4 7 19 |
Physicians’ specific role in recent euthanasia assessment procedures6 | |
Attending/referring physician7 Advising physician Performing physician None8 |
7 10 2 1 |
1 Some have more than one work environment
2 Some have more than one specific academic and/or professional background or medical end-of-life training
3 These people are entrusted with e.g., the patient-intake and referral at end-of-life information or end-of-life consultation centers
4 Experts by experience, i.e. people classified with a (proneness to) mental illness, that are trained to provide support for someone who is ‘new’ to the experience or entering rehabilitation approaches
5 With concrete experience, it is meant ‘being confronted with and/or actively engaged in a euthanasia procedure, predominantly based on psychiatric conditions’
6 Some had experience in more than 1 role
7 Some of these physicians hold a normative stance against euthanasia in the context of psychiatry but fulfilled the minimal physician requirement of referring a patient to a colleague-physician upon the patient’s explicit request (n = 4)
8 This physician expressly refused to fulfill the minimal physician requirement due to conscientious objection