Skip to main content
. 2017 May 6;74(19):3577–3598. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2533-x

Table 2.

FRET parameters of M-TTR adopting different conformational states

Conformational state R (Å) E R 0 (Å) Q D n J(λ) (nm4 M−1 cm−1) κ 2
Folded (0 M urea) 21.3 (±1.6) 0.72 (±0.02) 24.9 (±1.4) 0.050 (±0.008) 1.332 (±0.001) 1.96 × 1014 (±0.20 × 1014) 0.87 (±0.2)
Unfolded (6 M urea) 30.8 (±1.7) 0.29 (±0.01) 26.5 (±1.4) 0.070 (±0.004) 1.384 (±0.002) 3.09 × 1014 (±0.15 × 1014) 0.67 (±0.2)
Equilibrium partially folded (1 M urea) 24.0 (±1.6) 0.63 (±0.02) 26.2 (±1.3) 0.054 (±0.003) 1.358 (±0.001) 2.66 × 1014 (±0.13 × 1014) 0.87 (±0.2)
Amyloidogenic partially folded (0 M urea, pH 4.5) 21.1 (±1.2) 0.73 (±0.02) 24.9 (±1.4) 0.049 (±0.003) 1.332 (±0.001) 2.03 × 1014 (±0.10 × 1014) 0.87 (±0.2)

E values were determined experimentally from the fluorescence spectra of DACM-M-TTR and M-TTR, respectively. Q D was determined experimentally using free tryptophan as a reference. n was determined experimentally using a 2WAJ ABBE bench refractometer from Optika Microscopes (Bergamo, Italy). J(λ) was determined experimentally as the integral expressing the degree of spectral overlap between donor emission and acceptor absorption [44, 45]. κ 2 was assumed to be 0.87 ± 0.2 for folded proteins [46] and 2/3 (0.67 ± 0.2) for unfolded proteins [44]. R 0 values were determined using Eq. 3. R values were determined from E and R 0 values using Eq. 4