Skip to main content
. 2024 May 21;14:11569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62272-z

Table 1.

Table shows the treatment effect as the tumor volume for a treatment relative to the tumor volume of a reference treatment, averaged over a time period (Eq. 1).

Tumor cell line Dose Days aPDL1 vs PBS Proton vs X-rays
Xray Proton PBS aPDL1
MOC1 0 10–19 0.80 ± 0.07**
5 10–19 0.82 ± 0.08* 0.80 ± 0.09* 1.00 ± 0.11 0.96 ± 0.16
10 20–29 0.61 ± 0.11** 0.72 ± 0.10* 0.85 ± 0.11 1.01 ± 0.19
15 20–29 0.32 ± 0.06** 0.50 ± 0.09** 1.28 ± 0.21 2.03 ± 0.43**
20 20–29 0.62 ± 0.14* 0.61 ± 0.14** 1.32 ± 0.24 1.30 ± 0.34
MOC2 0 5–9 1.11 ± 0.09
10 10–14 0.78 ± 0.10* 0.81 ± 0.10* 0.91 ± 0.12 0.93 ± 0.14
20 10–14 0.84 ± 0.13 0.77 ± 0.17 0.87 ± 0.11 0.81 ± 0.20
30 10–14 0.97 ± 0.14 0.89 ± 0.19 0.73 ± 0.11** 0.67 ± 0.13**

Uncertainties are given as 95% confidence intervals. Reference treatments are PBS or X-rays. p-values were calculated as Fishers combined probability test (within a time period) where individual p-values for each time point used in the calculation were found by paired t-test. p-values < .05 are marked with * and p-values < .01 are marked with **.