Table 3.
ANOVA of the AMMI for the root yield of 17 sweet potato genotypes studied across five locations of Bangladesh during 2022–23 growing season.
| SV | DF | SS | MSSs | TSS (%) | GEI (%) | GEIC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | 84 | 7616.52 | 90.67⁎⁎⁎ | 70.32 | – | – |
| E | 4 | 1049.41 | 262.35⁎⁎⁎ | 6.91 | – | – |
| R(E) | 10 | 244.65 | 24.47⁎⁎⁎ | 1.61 | – | – |
| G | 16 | 6567.11 | 410.44⁎⁎⁎ | 43.25 | – | – |
| GEI | 64 | 3060.52 | 47.82⁎⁎⁎ | 20.16 | – | – |
| PC1 | 19 | 1347.95 | 70.94⁎⁎⁎ | 8.88 | 44 | 44 |
| PC2 | 17 | 934.44 | 54.97⁎⁎⁎ | 6.15 | 30.5 | 74.6 |
| Residuals | 28 | 778.12 | 27.79⁎⁎⁎ | 5.12 | 25.4 | 100 |
| Error | 160 | 1200.90 | 7.51 | 7.91 | – | – |
| Total | 318 | 15,183.10 | 47.75 | – | – | – |
SV = source of variation, E= location, R = replication, G= genotype, T = treatments (G+E+GEI), GEIC= GEI cumulative of PCs, PC= principal component, DF = degrees of freedom, SS = sum of squares, TSS = total sum of squares, MSS = mean sum of squares.
s
Significant at p ≤ 0.001.