Skip to main content
. 2024 May 11;10(10):e31134. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31134

Table 1.

Effect of diets or dietary components on the change of faecal pH or organic acids (mM) based on the literature data. pH and organic acid values are shown as difference compared to control diet or baseline period.

Diet type or food Control diet n* nc* pH Acetate Butyrate Propionate Reference
Low FODMAP sham 21 20 0.4 −24.5 −10.2 −8.7 [23]
Low FODMAP habitual 33 0.2 −2 −2.7 −1 [24]
Yacon (FOS, inulin) habitual 24 −0.4 −2.9 0.5 −1.6 [27]
Inulin habitual 32 −1 11 3 −1 [28]
Oat beta-glucan habitual 25 12.8 2.1 2.8 [29]
High-amylose barley Refined grain 17 −0.3 10.1 8.8 2.2 [30]
Almond habitual 35 −0.3 −4.6 0.8 1.1 [31]
Vegan omnivore 36 36 −0.3 0 3.3 −3.9 [32]
Wholegrain-rich Refined grain 50 −0.1 no 0.7 no [4]
Wheat bran (28 g/day) habitual 13 −0 8.1 10 −2.1 [33]
Wheat bran + RS (12 + 22 g/day habitual 20 −0.1 8.6 12 −2.4 [34]
Wheat bran fibre (30 g/day) Low fibre 24 3.5 2.1 0.1 [35]
RS (30 g/day) Low fibre 24 2.9 3.5 −1.2 [35]
RS rich foods (38 g/day) Low RS (5 g/day) 11 −0.6 21 7.2 −2.5 [36]
Wheat bran extract (AXOS, 10 g/day) placebo 57 −0.2 0.3 −0.1 0.1 [37]
AX (15 g/day) placebo 17 0.2 6.2 2.5 0.5 [38]
Mediterranean Western 40 31 0.3 3.7 −1.0 −1.9 [39]
Normal protein weight loss maintenance 18 −0.2 −9 −2.9 −2 [21]
HP, low fat habitual 11 15 0.7 [25]
HP weight loss maintenance 18 0.1 −15.9 −9.4 −2.8 [21]
HP MC maintenance 17 0.1 −6.2 −2.2 −3.7 [22]
HP MC maintenance 16 −21.6 −8.8 −6.5 [26]
HP LC maintenance 17 0.5 −22.4 −8.5 −6.4 [22]
HP LC maintenance 18 −29.6 −13.3 −9.5 [26]
Colorectal cancer Healthya 21 14 1 [40]
Colorectal cancer Healthya 93 49 0.5 −10.3 −4.1 −7.1 [3]

n* and nc* - indicates the number of participants in the study intervention group or control group, respectively. If nc is missing it indicates to the cross-over study.

a

Compared with no CRC subjects, RS – resistant starch, AX – arabinoxylan, AXOS – arabinooligosaccharides, HP - high protein, LC - low carbs, MC - medium carbs.