Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 30;13(2):108–120. doi: 10.7762/cnr.2024.13.2.108

Table 3. Fruit provision status.

Variables Total (n = 252) Long-term care hospital (n = 118) Live-in long-term care facility (n = 103) Non-live-in long-term care facility (n = 31) p value*
Providing fruits 0.000
Yes 178 (70.6) 69 (58.5) 85 (82.5) 24 (77.4)
No 72 (28.6) 48 (40.7) 17 (16.5) 7 (22.6)
No answer 2 (0.8) 1 (0.8) 1 (1.0) 0 (0.0)
Frequency of providing fruits if answered “Yes” (n = 178) 0.017
> 3 times/day 2 (1.1) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.2) 1 (4.2)
2 times/day 15 (8.4) 9 (13.0) 6 (7.1) 0 (0.0)
1 time/day 33 (18.5) 14 (20.3) 14 (16.5) 5 (20.8)
4–6 times/wk 19 (10.7) 7 (10.1) 11 (12.9) 1 (4.2)
2–3 times/wk 45 (25.3) 11 (15.9) 29 (34.1) 5 (20.8)
1 time/wk 34 (19.1) 9 (13.0) 18 (21.2) 7 (29.2)
2–3 times/mon 15 (8.4) 7 (10.1) 4 (4.7) 4 (16.7)
Less than 1 time/mon 10 (5.6) 8 (11.6) 1 (1.2) 1 (4.2)
No answer 5 (2.8) 4 (5.8) 1 (1.2) 0 (0.0)
Factors to consider when providing fruits if answered “Yes” (n = 178)* 0.066
Preference 121 (22.7) 41 (19.8) 64 (25.1) 16 (22.2)
Cost 120 (22.5) 60 (29.0) 50 (19.6) 10 (13.9)
Ease of consumption 113 (21.2) 36 (17.4) 60 (23.5) 17 (23.6)
Nutrition 85 (15.9) 26 (12.6) 43 (16.9) 16 (22.2)
Convenience of provision 72 (13.5) 33 (15.9) 33 (12.9) 6 (8.3)
Others 8 (1.5) 2 (1.0) 5 (2.0) 1 (1.4)
No answer 15 (2.8) 9 (4.3) 0 (0.0) 6 (8.3)
Barriers for providing fruits if answered “No” (n = 72)§ 0.002
Cost 59 (27.3) 48 (33.3) 6 (11.8) 5 (23.8)
Difficulties in providing fruits considering their individual chewing abilities 53 (24.5) 27 (18.8) 19 (37.3) 7 (33.3)
Insufficient manpower 38 (17.6) 30 (20.8) 6 (11.8) 2 (9.5)
Self-consumption 33 (15.3) 23 (16.0) 9 (17.6) 1 (4.8)
No demand 10 (4.6) 3 (2.1) 4 (7.8) 3 (14.3)
Others 6 (2.8) 6 (4.2) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
No answer 17 (7.9) 7 (4.9) 7 (13.7) 3 (14.3)

Values are presented as number (%).

*The p values were analyzed using the χ2 test; p < 0.001; p < 0.05, §Multiple response analysis; p < 0.01.