Skip to main content
. 2024 May 9;10(10):e30756. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30756

Table 6.

Performance comparison in term of overall accuracy (%) of various Glove embedding dimensions on all datasets.

Model IMDB MR (2002) MR (2004) (2005)
RAE [45] - - - 77.7
MNB [46] 86.6 - - 79.0
SVM [47] 89.2 - - -
NBSVM [46] 91.2 - - 79.4
MTL-ML4 [51]
LSTM [40] 87.0 80.1
BiLSTM [40] 87.9 - - 80.3
AC-BiLSTM [40] 91.8 - - 83.2
Static CNN [48] - - - 81.0
Non-Static CNN [48] - - - 81.5
Multichannel CNN [48] 88.1 88.4 81.7 81.1
BERT [49] 94.0 88.0 89.0 -
CNN [49] 91.1 84.2 89.1 -
B-CNN [49] 93.0 87.1 90.3 -
B-MLCNN [49] 95.1 88.2 95.0 -
Glove CNN-BiLSTM [38] 89.5 - - 84.4
LSTM [50] 81.7 - - 72.7
BiLSTM [50] 85.0 - - 74.7
PEW (Proposed) 86.4 81.2 83.4 85.9
PEW + C (Proposed) 86.9 83.1 84.1 84.1
PEW + MC (Proposed) 87.7 83.7 84.9 86.2
PEW +MCAB (Proposed) 90.3 84.1 85.9 87.1