Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 23;71(18):3611–3626. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1591-6

Table 1.

Subcellular localization of DPP9-S, DPP9-l, and various DPP9 mutants

Nucleus > cytosol (%) Nucleus = cytosol (%) Cytosol > nucleus (%)
DPP9-l 94.6 ± 7.9 5.4 ± 8.0 0 ± 0.1
DPP9-l ΔNLS 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 100 ± 0
DPP9-l K5AK6AR8A 0.2 ± 0.3 0 ± 0 99.8 ± 0.3
DPP9-l R2AK3A 94.9 ± 7.6 3.9 ± 6.2 1.2 ± 1.4
DPP9-l R8A 4.4 ± 6.1 36.8 ± 30.6 58.8 ± 32.7
DPP9-l R2A 96.3 ± 4.6 1.6 ± 1.5 2.0 ± 5.2
DPP9-S 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 100 ± 0
DPP9-S + NLS 92.5 ± 18.6 5.8 ± 13.9 1.7 ± 4.7

For quantification of subcellular localization, transfected cells were grouped into the following three categories: N>C (stronger signals in the nucleus), N=C (equal signal intensities in the nucleus and in the cytoplasm) and C>N (stronger signals in the cytosol). Quantification was performed from at least two independent experiments, from at least four slides with more than 340 cells expressing the respective DPP9 protein being counted