Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 3;69(21):3701–3713. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1049-7

Table 1.

The conformational stability of the isomolar mixture of NDB1/NDB2, and the dependence of ΔG d on Gd.HCl concentration, m, measured without and with ATP, and at different concentrations of the potentiator PBF

(kcal/M) m (kcal/mol/M) n
Control 0 ATP 6.86 ± 0.34 3.16 ± 0.16 4
PBF 25 nM 4.81 ± 0.68 3.43 ± 0.27 7
2 mM ATP 5.72 ± 0.79 2.68 ± 0.32 3
PBF 12.5 nM + 2 mM ATP 4.92 ± 0.55 3.43 ± 0.22 1
PBF 25 nM + 2 mM ATP 5.04 ± 0.11 4.37 ± 0.28 4
PBF 200 nM + 2 mM ATP 5.63 ± 0.05 5.00 ± 0.12 1

Data represent the results of the fit ± SD of the mean of data shown in Fig. 3 with Eq. 5