Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Electrocardiol. 2020 Dec 3;65:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.11.014

Table 6.

Comparison with previous results on DS2

Reference SEN (%) PPV (%) F1 (%) Notes
de Chazal et al. [Table 8, 15] 77.7 81.6 79.6 Multi-class, multi-lead
Llamedo & Martinez [Table 6, 16] 82.9 88.0 85.4 Multi-lead, multi-class
Llamedo & Martinez [Discussion, 17] 92.2 94.8 93.5 Expert-assisted, multi-lead, multi-class
Oster et al. [Table 4, 34] 92.7 96.2 94.5 Expert-assisted, multi-lead
Alfaras et al. [Table 7, 23] 92.7 95.7 94.2
Ortin et al. [Table 4, 39] 95.3 88.8 91.9 Augmented training database, validated on DS1 & DS2
Qurraie & Afkhami [Table 4, 35] 95.4 94.1 94.8 Multi-class
This work (Classifier1) 93.8 94.9 94.4

Note: The computational time is discussed in the Comparison with Previous Results in the Discussion section. SEN = sensitivity; PPV = positive predictive value; F1 = F1 score.