Table 2.
Key aspects of osseointegration and neural interfaces with sensory feedback in the context of prosthetic technology.
Aspect/Parameter | Osseointegration | Neural Interfaces and Sensory Feedback |
---|---|---|
Definition | Direct integration of prosthetic limb with user’s bone. | Bridging the gap between man-made devices and biological systems. |
Advantages | Enhanced stability, comfort, and functionality. | More intuitive control and natural movement of prosthetic limbs. |
Recent developments | Emergence of percutaneous osseointegrated prostheses (POP). | Integration of artificial skin with prosthetic devices for tactile feedback. |
Key features | Transcutaneous implant interfaces directly with underlying bone. | Intracortical electrodes enable direct neural recordings from motor cortex. |
Materials utilized | Titanium alloys, biocompatible coatings. | Flexible electronics, tactile sensors for mimicking human skin sensitivity. |
Improvement focus | Biomechanical interface between prosthetic implant and residual bone. | Bidirectional communication between prosthetic devices and user’s nervous system. |
Applications | Enhanced stability, comfort, and functionality in prosthetic limbs. | Perception of texture, shape, hardness of objects with tactile sensors in prosthetic hands. |
Disadvantages | Risk of infection, potential for implant rejection. | Complexity of surgical procedures, limited availability of advanced sensory feedback systems. |
Future prospects | Widespread adoption and improved quality of life for individuals with limb loss. | Restoring sensory-motor capabilities, seamless integration of prosthetic devices into daily life. |