Table 5.

Component three of three: considerations of dissemination & evaluation

1	Is it both freely and logistically accessible to individuals who experience up to sixteen marginalization outlined in Component Two? Who has been successfully sampled or engaged, and what is the quantitative average of simultaneous marginalizations experienced by the sample?
2	Given existing transaction-based structures, does it take into account opportunity costs in engagement - in terms of participants’ time, labor, health, mental well-being, relationships etc. - especially for individuals who lack access to basic livelihood?
3	If it promises or implies certain outcomes, is it explicit in communicating the actual risks of such outcomes not being successfully attained?
4	During engagement, does it actively acknowledge and address how the marginalized may be forced - or taught - to self-censor AND align with privileged perspectives?
5	Does it analyze in-depth what positive sentiments or positive feedback is based upon?
6	Does it acknowledge and intently explore simultaneous and inadvertent negative impacts alongside the positive?
7	Does it acknowledge the dynamic, shifting nature of actions as processes, and address negative impacts which may arise at future points in time despite previous positive assessment?