Skip to main content
. 2024 May 16;12(10):1035. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101035

Table 4.

Study characteristics and results. OR, oscillating–rotating; RMNPI, Rustogi Modified Naval Plaque Index; MGI, Modified Gingival Index; GBI, Gingival Bleeding Index; TMQH, Turesky modified Quigley–Hein plaque index; SE, standard error.

Authors, Year Country/Setting/Population Study Design (All Randomised Controlled Trials) Intervention Comparator Outcome Measure(s) Follow-Up Duration Number of Participants (Dropouts in Brackets) Results for Interproximal Plaque
Sjögren, K., Lundberg, A., Birkhed, D., Dudgeon, D. and Johnson, M., 2004 [21] Sweden,
adults
Four-period crossover design Four regimens: 1. Manual brushing only with Jordan Active Tip toothbrush. 2. Manual brushing after flossing (as above, plus waxed floss from Johnson & Johnson). 3. Oral-B Ultra Plaque Remover (D9). 4. Sonicare Plus (now renamed Sonicare Advance) See intervention Wet weight inter proximal plaque (mg) 8 days for each regimen 47 (unclear if any dropouts) Wet weight inter proximal plaque (mg) mean (SD)
Day 1: OR brush = 14.8 (11.5); sonic brush = 5.7 (2.5)
Day 8: OR brush = 17.2 (10.8); sonic brush = 6.0 (2.6)
Sharma, N., Goyal, C., Qaqish, J., Cugini, M., Thompson, M. and Warren, P., 2005 [22] Clinic, adults Randomised, examiner-blind, three-arm, single-use crossover design OR/pulsating brush: Oral-B ProfessionalCare 7000, 340 Hz pulsation, 73 Hz oscillation OR/pulsating brush: Oral-B 3D Excel (3DE), 340 Hz pulsation, 63 Hz oscillation; sonic brush: Sonicare Advance toothbrush, 260 Hz, Easy Start feature deactivated, used with “normal” settings RMNPI, reduction safety Minimum 8 days 79 (0) Post-brushing RMNPI scores and plaque reduction (mean (SD))
PC7000: Post-brushing RMNPI = 0.33, (0.12) plaque reduction = 0.68 (0.12); 3DE: Post-brushing RMNPI = 0.32 (0.11), plaque reduction = 0.68 (0.11); sonic brush: Post-brushing RMNPI = 0.41 (0.15), plaque reduction = 0.59 (0.15)
Strate, J., Cugini, M., Warren, P.R., Qaqish, J., Galustians, H. and Sharma, N., 2005 [23] Research facility, adults Randomised, examiner-blind, crossover design with two study visits OR toothbrush: Oral-B Professional Care Series, oscillation angle of 45 degrees, 73 Hz, with a pulsation frequency of 340 Hz Sonic toothbrush: Sonicare Elite (260 Hz, Easy Start feature deactivated) RMNPI, reduction safety Minimum 4 days 61 (0) Post-brushing RMNPI scores and mean plaque reduction (mean (SD)): OR toothbrush: Post-brushing = 0.034 (0.06), mean plaque reduction = 0.966 (0.06), % plaque removal = 96.6%;
sonic toothbrush: Post-brushing = 0.271 (0.18), mean plaque reduction = 0.729 (0.18), % plaque removal = 72.9% p = 0.0001
Biesbrock, A., Bartizek, R., Walters, P., Warren, P., Cugini, M., Goyal, C. and Qaqish, J., 2007 [24] Adults Two studies used a randomised, examiner-blind, two-treatment, crossover design Oscillating–rotating brush: Oral-B Triumph. This power brush has a round brush head and three-dimensional motion (rotation–oscillation plus pulsation). It operates at 8800 oscillations/40,000 pulsations per minute. The toothbrush was fitted with a FlossAction brush head. Sonic brush: Sonicare Elite 7300. This power brush has a conventionally shaped brush head and side-to-side motion. It operates at a frequency of 260 Hz. The Easy Start feature was deactivated prior to use, and the brush was used with the normal settings. This toothbrush can be used with either the standard, full-size brush head or a newly designed compact brush head intended for smaller mouths and precision cleaning. Whole-mouth plaque reduction (RMNPI)
Marginal and interproximal plaque reduction (RMNPI)
Study 1: 2 weeks
Study 2: Approximately 3 weeks
Study 1: 50 (0) Study 2: 49 (1) Reduction in RMNPI score (mean ± SD)
Study 1:
OR brush = 0.8275 ± 0.07; sonic brush = 0.6323 ± 0.12 (OR brush 21% greater reduction than sonic brush, p < 0.001)
Study 2:
OR brush = 0.758 ± 0.007; sonic brush = 0.662 ± 0.007 (OR brush 14.6% greater reduction than sonic brush, p < 0.001)
Biesbrock, Walters, Bartizek, Goyal and Qaqish, 2008 [25] Canada, adults Randomised, examiner-blind, two-treatment, four-period, four-sequence crossover AABB, ABBA, BBAA, BAAB treatment sequences Oscillating–rotating brush Oral-B Triumph with FlossAction brush head with MicroPulse bristles (8800 oscillations/40,000 pulsations per minute) Sonic brush Sonicare FlexCare with ProResults brush head (260 Hz) Full-mouth plaque score, RMNPI post-brushing 12 days approximately 48 (3) Post-brushing plaque reduction adjusted mean ± SE:
OR toothbrush: 0.884 ± 0.013
Sonic toothbrush: 0.724 ± 0.013
Putt, Milleman, Jenkins, Schmitt, Master and State, 2008 [26] Independent clinical research organisation, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA, adults Single-use, examiner-masked, randomised, crossover Sonic toothbrush: Sonicare FlexCare with ProResults radial brush head Oscillating–rotating toothbrush: Oral-B Triumph Professional Care 9000 with FlossAction brush head % reduction in full-mouth plaque score, Turesky modified Quigley–Hein plaque index (TMQH), plaque scores by site safety 2 weeks approximately 94 (1) % reduction in TMQH for interproximal sites (mean ± SD): sonic toothbrush: 33.74 ± 14.79; oscillating–rotating toothbrush: 24.21 ± 14.27
Klukowska, M., Grender, J., Goyal, C., Mandl, C. and Biesbrock, A., 2012 [27] Adults Open-label, examiner-blind, two-treatment, parallel-group, randomised study OR toothbrush: Oral-B Triumph with SmartGuide (aka Oral-B Professional Care SmartSeries 5000 in US) with EB25 FlossAction brush head Sonic toothbrush: Philips Sonicare DiamondClean with DiamondClean standard brush head MGI, GBI, RMNPI safety, consumer perception assessment 12 weeks 130 (0) Adjusted mean reduction from baseline (SE), % reduction for interproximal RMNPI
Week 6:
OR toothbrush = 0.231 (0.0154), 23.3%
Sonic toothbrush = 0.188 (0.0154), 19.1%
Difference between brushes = 22.9%, p = 0.048
Week 12:
OR toothbrush = 0.387 (0.0156), 31.9%
Sonic toothbrush = 0.311 (0.0156), 31.6% Difference between brushes = 24.4%, p = 0.001
Klukowska, Grender, Conde and Goyal, 2013 [28] USA? (unclear), adults Randomised controlled, two-treatment, parallel-group, examiner-blind Oscillating–rotating brush Oral-B Triumph with FlossAction AB25 brush head Sonic brush Colgate ProClinical A1500 with Triple Clean brush head MGI, whole-mouth RMNPI 12 weeks 130 (4) Adjusted mean reduction from baseline (SE)
Week 4:
OR toothbrush: 0.275 (0.014); sonic toothbrush: 0.198 (0.014)
Week 12:
OR toothbrush: 0.407 (0.017); sonic toothbrush: 0.322 (0.016)
Klukowska, M., Grender, J., Conde, E., Ccahuana Vasquez, R. and Goyal, C., 2014 [29] Research centre, adults Randomised, two-treatment, examiner-blind, parallel-group design OR toothbrush: Oral-B Triumph with SmartGuide with FlossAction brush head, D34/EB25 Sonic toothbrush: Sonicare FlexCare Platinum with InterCare standard brush head MBI, GBI, number of bleeding sites, RMNPI safety 12 weeks 130 (3) Interproximal RMNPI reduction (adjusted mean reduction (SE), % change
6 weeks:
OR brush = 0.205 (0.0142), 20.7%; sonic brush = 0.181 (0.0141), 18.3%; 13.3% difference between brushes, p = 0.231
12 weeks:
OR brush = 0.344 (0.0155), 34.7%; sonic brush = 0.309 (0.0153); 31.2% 11.3% difference between brushes, p = 0.112
Klukowska, M., Grender, J., Conde, E., Goyal, C., Qaqish, J. and Schneider, M., 2014 [30] Unclear Randomised, examiner-blind, two-treatment, parallel-group study OR toothbrush: Oral-B Triumph with SmartGuide with Oral-B CrossAction brush head D34.EB50 Sonic toothbrush: Sonicare DiamondClean with standard brush head MGI, GBI, number of bleeding sites, RMNPI safety, user experience 6 weeks 130 (2) Six-week adjusted mean reduction from baseline RMNPI interproximal plaque (SE), % change
OR toothbrush = 0.280 (0.0130), 28.4%;
sonic toothbrush = 0.210 (0.0130), 21.3%; 33.3% difference between brushes, p < 0.001
Ccahuana-Vasquez, R., Conde, E., Grender, J., Cunningham, P., Qaqish, J. and Goyal, C., 2015 [31] Unclear Randomised, examiner-blind, two-treatment, parallel-group Oscillating–rotating brush: Oral-B Professional Care 1000 [D16u] with Oral-B CrossAction brush head [EB50] Sonic brush: Sonicare DiamondClean with standard DiamondClean brush head RMNPI, MGI, GBI 8 weeks ± 2 days 150 (2) Adjusted mean reduction (SE), % change (between baseline and week 8):
OR toothbrush = 0.349 (0.0140), 34.9%;
sonic toothbrush = 0.270 (0.0142), 27%; 29.3% difference between groups, p < 0.001
Lv, Guo and Ling, 2018 [32] Guangzhou city, China Randomised, examiner-blind, parallel-group, with two-treatment sub-trials High-frequency sonic toothbrush: GEVILAN GET011 with GEH011 brush head (683 Hz) (Group A) Oscillating–rotating toothbrush: Oral-B PRO 700 with Cross Action brush head (8800 oscillations and 20,000 pulsations per minute) (Group B)
Sonic brush: Philips Sonicare Healthy White HX6712 with ProResults brush head (517 Hz) (Group C) MGI
RMNPI, MGI, GBI safety 6 months 120 (1) Adjusted mean reduction from baseline (SE), % change
Month 3:
A: 0.114 (0.017), 11.5%
B: 0.082 (0.017), 8.3%
C: 0.108 (0.016), 11.1%
Month 6:
A: 0.169 (0.013), 17.1%
B: 0.131 (0.013), 13.3%
C: 0.219 (0.019), 22.4%
Adam, Goyal, Qaqish and Grender, 2020 [33] Canada (unclear) Randomised, open-label, parallel-group, examiner-blind Oscillating–rotating brush Oral-B iO and Ultimate Clean brush head M7/OC15 Sonic brush Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart Sonic and Premium Plaque control brush head HX9903/11 Modified Gingival Index, Gingival Bleeding Index, RMNPI safety after using the assigned toothbrush for the study period 8 weeks 90 (0) Adjusted mean (SE) change from baseline:
Sonic: 0.324 (0.0234)
Oscillating–rotating: 0.458 (0.0234)
Goyal, C., Adam, R., Timm, H., Grender, J. and Qaqish, J., 2021 [34] Germany/research centre Single-centre, examiner-blind, two-treatment, open-label, parallel-group, randomised study OR brush: Oral-B iO with Ultimate Clean brush head (M7/OR015) in Daily Clean mode Sonic brush: Sonicare DiamondClean with Premium Plaque Control brush head (HX9903/11) Clean mode with an intensity level of 3 (high) MGI, GBI, RMNPI 6 months 110 (0) Adjusted mean (SE) change from baseline interproximal RMNPI
Day 1—single brushing:
OR brush = 0.891 (0.0101);
sonic brush = 0.794 (0.0101); 12% difference between groups, p < 0.001. Week 1—OR brush = 0.116 (0.0126);
sonic brush = 0.063 (0.0126); 84.5% difference between groups, p = 0.003. Week 24—OR brush = 0.467 (0.0247);
sonic brush = 0.371 (0.0247); 25.8% difference between groups, p = 0.007