Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 24;60(5):692. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050692

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of baseline predictors of overall survival.

Features Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
HR (95%CI) p Value 1 HR (95%CI) p Value 1
Sex (F vs. M) 0.96 (0.72–1.28) 0.764
Age at HCC enrollment 1.29 (0.87–1.92) 0.038 1.02 (1.00–1.04) 0.120
Etiology (viral vs. others) 1.19 (0.85–1.69) 0.314
Diameter (≥5 cm vs. <5 cm) 1.79 (1.26–2.55) 0.001 1.50 (1.03–2.18) 0.034
Child-Pugh score (B–C vs. A) 1.63 (1.17–2.27) 0.004 1.41 (0.99–2.01) 0.042
BCLC stage (A vs. 0) 2.07 (1.46–2.95) <0.001 1.79 (1.22–2.62) 0.003
HCC Grade (3 vs. 1–2) 1.43 (0.98–2.09) 0.061
PVT (yes vs. no) 1.84 (1.29–2.63) 0.001 1.03 (0.56–1.89) 0.918
Malignant PVT (yes vs. no) 2.20 (1.51–3.21) <0.001 2.34 (1.24–4.44) 0.009
Type of treatment (locoregional vs. surgical) 1.29 (0.84–2.00) 0.247
AFP ≥ 20 ng/mL (vs. < 20 ng/mL) 1.17 (0.88–1.55) 0.285
AFP ≥ 200 ng/mL (vs. < 200 ng/mL) 1.27 (0.82–1.99) 0.287
AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL (vs. < 400 ng/mL) 1.11 (0.67–1.83) 0.688
AFP ≥ 1000 ng/mL (vs. < 1000 ng/mL) 2.29 (1.35–3.89) 0.002 2.20 (1.28–3.78) 0.004

1 Cox regression analysis; CI: confidence interval; AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; BCLC: Barcellona Clinic Liver Cancer; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; HR: hazard ratio; PVT: portal vein thrombosis.