Skip to main content
. 2004 Jul 1;122(4):158–160. doi: 10.1590/S1516-31802004000400005

Table 4. Results of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the literature and our data.

Author Country Population Gender/age Number screened Criteria for positiveness (diameter in mm) % of patients with aneurysm
Holdsworth et al.1 United Kingdom Men/65-79 628 > 29 6.7
Kyriakides et al.2 United Kingdom Men/65 3,497 > 30 4.9
Vazquez et al.3 Belgium Men/65 and 75 727 > 29 4.5
Boll et al.4 Netherlands Men/65-80 2,416 > 29 8.1
Scott et al.5 United Kingdom Men/65-80 1,947 > 29 7.6
Women/65-80 2,290 > 29 1.3
Lindholt et al.6 Denmark Men/65-73 3,748 > 29 4.1
Krohn et al.7 Norway Men/> 60 500 > 29 or 50% greater than proximal aorta 8.2
Collin et al.8 United Kingdom Men/65-74 426 > 40 or 5 mm greater than suprarenal aorta 5.4
Lederle et al.9 United States of America Men/50-79 52,745 > 29 3.6
Lucarotti et al.10 United Kingdom Men/65 4,232 26-39 7.1
> 39 1.3
Ögren et al.11 Sweden Men/74 343 > 35 11.1
Morris et al.12 United Kingdom Men/> 50 3,030 > 25 11.1
Bonamigo and Siqueira13 Brazil Men/> 54 1,012 > 29 or 3.5 mm greater than suprarenal aorta 1.7
Present study Brazil Men/> 50 1,228 > 29 4.6
Women/> 50 1,528 > 29 0.6