Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 8;6(6):101065. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101065

Table 4.

Potential risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, variceal bleeding, and non-gastrointestinal bleeding in patients treated with atezo/bev.

Variable Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
OR 95% (CI) p value OR 95% (CI) p value
Gastrointestinal bleeding
Age 0.98 0.95–1.0 0.15
Sex, male 1.1 0.55–2.5 0.75
Liver cirrhosis 2.1 0.99–5.0 0.07
CPS B (CPS A as reference) 1.3 0.52–3.0 0.54
CPS C (CPS A as reference) 1.6 0.34–5.5 0.51
MVI 0.96 0.44–2.0 0.91
Platelets 1 0.99–1.0 0.14
Spleen size 1.2 1.0–1.3 0.007 1.1 1.0–1.3 0.03
Presence of varices 1.8 0.91–3.5 0.09
History of variceal bleeding 3.9 1.4–10 0.007 3.0 1.0–8.4 0.04
NSBB 0.8 0.37–1.6 0.54
Prior EBL 2.1 0.91–4.5 0.07
Anticoagulation 1.5 0.75–2.8 0.26
Antiplatelets
0.76
0.34–1.6
0.47



Variceal bleeding
Age 0.96 0.92–1.0 0.07
Sex, male 2.2 0.59–14 0.31
CPS B (CPS A as reference) 2.4 0.70–7.1 0.14
CPS C (CPS A as reference) 1.4 0.072–8.1 0.77
MVI 1.6 0.51–5.1 0.40
Platelets 1 0.99–1.0 0.18
Spleen size 1.2 1.0–1.4 0.04
Presence of varices 4.5 1.4–21 0.02
Esophageal varices grade I 2.7 0.59–14 0.2
Esophageal varices grades II–III 8.6 2.2–42 0.003
History of variceal bleeding 2.5 0.37–9.8 0.26
NSBB 1.2 0.38–3.5 0.7
Prior EBL 2.4 0.64–7.2 0.15
Anticoagulation
2
0.68–5.4
0.2



Non-gastrointestinal bleeding
Age 0.99 0.95–1.0 0.53 1 0.97–1.0 0.74
Sex, male 2.2 0.84–7.7 0.14 2.1 0.79–7.4 0.17
Liver cirrhosis 2.3 0.92–6.9 0.10
CPS B/C (CPS A as reference) 0.24 0.037–0.83 0.05 ns
Platelets 1 1.0–1.0 0.57
Anticoagulation 2.3 1.1–4.9 0.02 2.2 1.0–4.7 0.04
Antiplatelets 1.5 0.65–4.3 0.36

ORs for the risk of bleeding were calculated using both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Liver cirrhosis was not included in the model for risk factors of variceal bleeding, because the presence of liver cirrhosis and the occurrence of variceal bleeding were linearly dependent predictors causing estimation instability unsuitable for logistic regression analysis. The bold emphasis indicate statistical significant results. azeto/bev, atezolizumab/bevacizumab; CPS, Child–Pugh score; EBL, endoscopic band ligation; MVI, macrovascular invasion; NSBB, non-selective beta-blocker; OR, odds ratio.