Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 18;2014(12):CD008203. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008203.pub3

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Statin versus placebo for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Statin versus placebo for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism
Patient or population: 17,802 patients with low to normal levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (< 130 mg/dL)
 Settings: 1315 sites in 26 countries on 4 continents, including North and South America, Europe, and Africa
 Intervention: rosuvastatin 20 mg daily versus placebo
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control Statin versus placebo
All cases of VTE 
 Follow‐up: median 1.9 years Study population OR 0.57 
 (0.37 to 0.86) 17802
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1 Figure 1
7 per 1000 4 per 1000 
 (3 to 6)
Moderate
7 per 1000 4 per 1000 
 (3 to 6)
Pulmonary embolism 
 Follow‐up: mean 1.9 years See comment See comment Not estimable 17802
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1 Appendix 3
Deep vein thrombosis 
 Follow‐up: median 1.9 years See comment See comment Not estimable 17802
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1 Appendix 3
Any MI 
 Follow‐up: median 1.9 years Study population OR 0.45 
 (0.3 to 0.69) 17802
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1 Appendix 3
8 per 1000 3 per 1000 
 (2 to 5)
Moderate
8 per 1000 4 per 1000 
 (2 to 6)
Any stroke 
 Follow‐up: median 1.9 years Study population OR 0.51 
 (0.34 to 0.78) 17802
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1 Appendix 3
7 per 1000 4 per 1000 
 (2 to 6)
Moderate
7 per 1000 4 per 1000 
 (2 to 5)
Death 
 Follow‐up: median 1.9 years Study population OR 0.8 
 (0.66 to 0.96) 17802
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1 Appendix 3
28 per 1000 22 per 1000 
 (18 to 27)
Moderate
28 per 1000 23 per 1000 
 (19 to 27)
Any serious adverse event 
 Follow‐up: median 1.9 years Study population OR 1.07 
 (0.95 to 1.2) 17802
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1 Appendix 3
66 per 1000 70 per 1000 
 (63 to 78)
Moderate
66 per 1000 70 per 1000 
 (63 to 78)
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Total sample size is lower than the calculated optimal information size (OIS). Therefore the evidence was downgraded based on imprecision