Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 18;2014(12):CD008203. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008203.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
ACCEPT‐D This study studied the effects of aspirin and simvastatin combination
AFCAPS/TexCAPS The intervention in treatment group is diet and lovastatin, and the intervention in control group is diet
AIM‐HIGH All participants received simvastatin (or simvastatin plus ezetimibe) at a dose sufficient to maintain LDL‐ cholesterol. Participants were randomised to extended‐release niacin or matching placebo
ASTRONOMER This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
Caramelli 2002 This study did not report the VTE relevant outcome
CARDS This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
ChiCTR‐TNRC‐08000263 Non‐randomised control study
DECREASE III This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
Doggen 2004 Case‐control study
ELIMIT A total of 102 patients were randomised to either mono‐therapy with simvastatin (40 mg daily) or triple‐therapy with simvastatin (40 mg daily), ER niacin (1500 mg daily), and ezetimibe (10 mg daily). This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
Ge 2011 This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
Haak 2001 This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
HERS Cohort study
HPS2‐THRIVE This study compared ER niacin 2 g plus laropiprant 40 mg daily with placebo for occlusive arterial disease. This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
Huerta 2007 Case‐control study
Jeong 2013 This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
Lacut 2004 Case‐control study
Lacut 2008 Case‐control study
LEADe Mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease patients were receiving donepezil
Liu 2011 This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
MEGA This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
METEOR This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
NCT00437892 This study evaluated adult patients with a single episode of idiopathic VTE (either DVT or PE) who received at least 6 months of adequate treatment with oral anticoagulants, for whom treatment withdrawal is planned, and with LDL cholesterol levels of equal to or greater than 130 mg/dL, not evaluating the patients at risk of VTE
PROCEDURE This is a study protocol and does not report on the relevant VTE outcomes
PROSPER Case control study
Ramcharan 2009 Case‐control study
RATIONAL This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
Ray 2001a Cohort study
Rosen 2013 This study compared switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin (EZ/S) 10/20 mg with doubling the run‐in statin dose (to simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg) or switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg in subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes and did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
Shai 2014 Case‐control study
Smeeth 2009 Cohort study
Stangier 2009 Authors focused on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and did not mention all the outcomes we evaluated
Sørensen 2009 Case‐control study
van der Loo 2011 This study did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
West 2010 This study compared simvastatin with simvastatin plus ezetimibe and did not report the VTE relevant outcomes
Yang 2002 Cohort study

DVT: deep vein thrombosis
 ER: extended release
 LDL: low density lipoprotein
 PE: pulmonary embolism
 VTE: venous thromboembolism