Table 5. Multiple linear regression analysis of the vertical margin distance (n = 141).
Note: Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
SM depth, submucosal invasion depth; Rb, rectum (below the peritoneal reflection); Ra, rectum (above the peritoneal reflection); Rs, rectosigmoid
| β | 95% confidence interval | P value | |
| Traction device | -11.8 | (-62.0, 38.5) | 0.65 |
| Age, years | -2.6 | (-4.0, -1.1) | <0.001 |
| Sex, male | -19.0 | (-56.8, 18.7) | 0.32 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 2.0 | (-3.1, 0.01) | 0.43 |
| Hyaluronic acid | -30.5 | (-72.5, 11.4) | 0.156 |
| Non-expert | -13.1 | (-49.3, 23.2) | 0.48 |
| Location, Rb vs Ra/Rs | 30.1 | (-12.4, 72.7) | 0.167 |
| Lesion size, mm | -4.0 | (-14.5, 0.01) | 0.45 |
| SM depth, μm | -0.04 | (-0.06, -0.01) | 0.003 |