Table 2. Feasibility survey of the Japanese version of the ICU Mobility Scale (IMS-J) (N=25).

IMS - Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale; PT - physical therapist; RN - registered nurse

	Yes ％ (PT, RN)	NO ％ (PT, RN)	Unclear ％ (PT, RN)
Is the IMS-J clear and unambiguous?	96 (44, 52)	4 (4, 0)	0 (0, 0)
Did the IMS-J take less than 1 min to compete?	56 (32, 24)	36 (16, 20)	8 (0, 8)
Did the IMS-J take less than 5 min to compete?	92 (44, 48)	8 (4, 4)	0 (0, 0)
Does the IMS-J indicate what the scale is about and the overall purpose?	88 (48, 40)	4 (0, 4)	8 (0, 8)
Are there adequate definitions of the IMS-J, with examples?	84 (40, 44)	4 (0, 4)	12 (8, 4)
Are any levels of the scale irrelevant, misleading or superfluous?	24 (8, 16)	64 (32, 32)	12 (8, 4)
Are any levels of the scale offensive or otherwise inappropriate?	16 (8, 8)	80 (36, 44)	4 (4, 0)
Will respondents know the answer to the questions?	88 (40, 48)	4 (0, 4)	8 (8, 0)
Are any items unnecessary or repetitive?	12 (12, 0)	84 (32, 52)	4 (4, 0)
Is it an appropriate length?	84 (44, 40)	12 (4, 8)	4 (0, 4)