Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 30;16(2):139–149. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2024.139280

Table 3.

Comparison of intra-operative planning values with post-implant means without spacers from different institutions

Parameter Intra-operative Institute 1 Institute 2 Institute 3
GTV (cc) 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.8
GTV D90% (Gy) 265 246 208 251
GTV V100% (%) 99 90 100 100
GTV V150% (%) 50 44.7 68.9 85.3
GTV V200% (%) 26 26.2 42.4 47.9
CTV (cc) 11 9.9 11.4 2.3
CTV D90% (Gy) 213.9 216.6 211.9 210.4
CTV V100% (%) 91.3 84.3 96.6 99.9
CTV V150% (%) 43.8 50.1 70.2 79.3
CTV V200% (%) 20.9 29.2 47.1 46.5
Prostate volume (cc) 36.8 37.1 38 37
Prostate D90% (Gy) 66 57 55.3 57
Prostate V100% (%) 32 32.4 45.1 50.4
Ratio volume CTV focal/prostate 0.30 0.26 0.29 0.06
Urethra D0.1cc (Gy) 280 217.9 201.8 206.3
Urethra D10 (Gy) 247 197.8 196.3 195.7
Urethra D30 (Gy) 199 166.2 166.7 163.7
Rectum D2cc (Gy) 68 46.7 37 35.7
Rectum D1cc (Gy) 81 55.7 43.5 42
Rectum D0.1cc (Gy) 114 76.3 57 55.4
Rectum mean (Gy) 29 25.5 21.1 20.1
Rectum max dose (Gy) 145 86.7 62.5 62.2