Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 1;2014(7):CD004687. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004687.pub4

Baldoni 1995.

Methods Single‐centre RCT, 2‐year study, parallel design
Participants 36 women with urethral syndrome (urinary symptoms and pain without organic lesions) aged 18‐63 years (mean 40). All complained of urgency, dysuria and tenesmus at the first evaluation
Interventions Intervention: STDP (Davanloo 1980; Malan 1979). The psychotherapy consisted of 12‐16 weekly sessions lasting 1 hr conducted by a single psychotherapist
Control: "traditional urological treatment", which included medical therapy (anticholinergic and alpha‐adrenoceptor antagonist drugs) and urethral dilation
Both groups had 3‐4 months of therapy for a mean of 14 weeks
Outcomes Pre‐, 6 months post‐, 4 years post‐treatment. Presence and nature of urinary disorders such as urgency, dysuria, tenesmus; number of day and night micturitions; pain in the pelvic area and its features; the Symptom Questionnaire, which can discriminate between psychiatric patients and others and between various psychological discomfort levels by assessing anxiety, depression, somatic symptoms and hostility. Continuous data from Symptom Questionnaire used as obtained from authors
Notes 4 participants allocated to STDP group were given antidepressant pharmacotherapy (a combination of amitriptyline and mianserin) but 2 stopped treatment before completion and are not considered in the results
 Data obtained from authors in form of means, standard deviations for outcomes of interest: anxiety, depression and somatic symptoms of Symptom Questionnaire
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Quote: "randomly selected on the basis of the psychotherapist's schedule. i.e. when a treatment could be started, the urologists were asked to send the first patient"
Comment: sequence generated by a non‐random approach
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Comment: not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: self report questionnaires only: low risk
Blinding participants to treatment group not possible
No psychotherapist was blinded to the treatment delivered
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: did not include drop‐outs in analysis but reported on clinical status
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: did not include complete outcome data on all measures for entry in a meta‐analysis
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement