Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 1;2014(7):CD004687. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004687.pub4

Brom 1989.

Methods RCT with 4 parallel conditions
Participants 112 participants diagnosed with PTSD with DSM‐III criteria, with the condition that not more than 5 years had elapsed since the incurring event. Recruited through a general assessment with 1 of the study authors, and a further interview to ensure the participant could cope with a confronting therapy. Aged 18‐73 years (mean 42.0), 79% were women, 21% were men
Interventions Intervention 1: trauma desensitisation (mean length of treatment 15.0 sessions)
Intervention 2: hypnotherapy (mean 14.4 sessions)
Intervention 3: brief psychodynamic therapy (mean length 18.8 sessions) based on Horowitz 1976
Control: wait‐list group (4 months long)
Outcomes Pre‐, post‐ and 3 months post‐treatment. SCL‐90, with 5 subscales; STAI; State‐Trait Anger Inventory; Dutch Personality Questionnaire; Introversion‐Extroversion scale of the Amsterdam Biographical Questionnaire; scale for internal vs. external control
Notes SCL‐90 total score and STAI data used in the review
 Unable to use personality data as it was reported only into subscales
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: randomisation not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: self reports used (SCL90, STAI, Stait Trait Anger Inventory): low risk
No psychotherapist was blinded to the treatment delivered
Blinding participants to treatment group not possible
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: even distribution of drop‐outs
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement. No published report on pre‐specified outcomes
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement