Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 1;2014(7):CD004687. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004687.pub4

Svedlund 1983.

Methods RCT with 2 parallel conditions
Participants 102 participants with IBS, aged 16‐60 years (mean 24), 70 females
Exclusion criteria: other somatic or mental disorders requiring treatment, had previous abdominal surgery affecting the gastrointestinal tract, were on a disability pension or were not fluent in Swedish
Interventions Intervention: brief dynamic psychotherapy, based on Malan 1979, for 10 x 1‐hr long sessions over 3 months (mean 7.4 sessions), with medical TAU
Control: TAU ‐ bulk‐forming agents and, when appropriate, anticholinergic drugs, antacids and minor tranquillisers
Outcomes Pre, post and 15 months (after start of psychotherapy)
 Mental symptoms by CPRS and somatic symptoms, all rated by psychiatrist. On follow‐up, participant rating. In addition, SSIAM
Notes Additional data provided by study author used for psychiatric symptoms, anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms and somatic symptoms. SSIAM data used for social adjustment measure
 Data used for somatic symptoms, and anxiety, depression and general symptoms. SSIAM for social adjustment
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: stratified by gender and randomised. Details of method not provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: inadequate description
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: therapists were raters of some cases and may have been unblinded (CPRS, SSIAM): high risk
Self reports (social adjustment): low risk
No psychotherapist was blinded to the treatment delivered
Blinding participants to treatment group not possible
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "dropouts can be ruled out as contributing to different outcomes"
Comment: only 1 drop‐out from each group
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement. No published report on pre‐specified outcomes. Additional information was obtained from the authors to be entered in a meta‐analysis
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement