Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 27;2014(11):CD011298. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011298.pub2

Comparison 5. Birth‐spacing message models: health service (HSM) versus community awareness (CAM) versus standard care.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Contraceptive use postpartum (HSM versus standard care) 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 At 4 months 1 935 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.07 [1.58, 2.71]
1.2 At 10 to 12 months (if at risk) 1 930 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.08 [1.58, 2.74]
2 Contraceptive use postpartum (HSM versus CAM) 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 At 4 months 1 1031 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.79 [1.40, 2.30]
2.2 At 10 to 12 months (if at risk) 1 1025 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.24 [0.97, 1.59]
3 Use of LAM at 4 months postpartum 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 HSM versus standard care 1 935 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.72, 1.50]
3.2 HSM versus CAM 1 1031 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 41.36 [10.11, 169.20]
4 Knowlege of effective LAM use at 4 months postpartum (HSM versus standard care) 1 136 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.90 [0.91, 9.26]