Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 27;124(6):1757–1769. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05400-3

Table 2.

Mean and 95% CI of peak EMG activity expressed as a percentage of maximum voluntary isometric contraction for the gluteus maximus and medius exercises with p-values and Cohen’s d effect sizes of the pairwise comparisons

Muscle Exercise

Mean

[%MVIC]

95% CI

[%MVIC]

Pairwise comparisons
HT (3-RM) RKS HKGS SS (3-RM)
GMAX HT (3-RM) 143 133–154 p = 0.118; d = 0.62 p = 0.135; d = 0.59 p < 0.001*; d = 1.40
RKS 128 119–138 p = 0.118; d = 0.62 p = 1.000; d = 0.12 p = 0.011*; d = 0.96
HKGS 125 109–140 p = 0.135; d = 0.59 p = 1.000; d = 0.12 p = 0.064; d = 0.68
SS (3-RM) 100 86–115 p < 0.001*; d = 1.40 p = 0.011*; d = 0.96 p = 0.064; d = 0.68
GMED RPHA SP IC RSS
RPHA 149 131–167 p = 0.002*; d = 0.78 p = 0.001*; d = 1.01 p < 0.001*; d = 1.41
SP 118 104–133 p = 0.002*; d = 0.78 p = 1.000; d = 0.28 p = 0.040*; d = 0.71
IC 108 92 - 124 p = 0.001*; d = 1.01 p = 1.000; d = 0.28 p = 0.338; d = 0.41
RSS 93 77–109 p < 0.001*; d = 1.41 p = 0.040*; d = 0.71 p = 0.338; d = 0.41

Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between exercises are emphasized *

The 95% CIs for Cohen’s d effect sizes are provided in the supplementary data (A.3.2)

GMAX Gluteus maximus, GMED gluteus medius MVIC maximum voluntary isometric contraction, CI confidence interval, HT hip thrust, RKS resisted knee split, HKGS half-kneeling glute squeeze, SS split squat, RPHA resisted prone hip abduction, SP side-plank, IC isometric clam, RSS resisted side-stepping