Skip to main content
. 2024 May 6;16(2):283–294. doi: 10.3390/hematolrep16020028

Table 4.

Subgroup Analysis of Clinical Outcomes by Prophylactic Treatment Regimen. 1

Outcome Cyclosporine +
Mycophenolate
(n = 40)
In Vivo T-Cell
Depletion +
Cyclosporine + Methotrexate
(n = 15)
In Vivo T-Cell
Depletion +
Cyclosporine +
Mycophenolate
(n = 16)
In Vivo T-Cell
Depletion +
Methotrexate +
Mycophenolate
(n = 25)
Methotrexate +
Mycophenolate
(n = 18)
Mycophenolate
(n = 13)
Time from HSCT to aGVHD diagnosis
    Median (Q1, Q3), d 28.0
(17.5, 35.0)
57.0
(33.0, 76.0)
23.0
(15.0, 36.0)
34.0
(24.0, 44.0)
25.5
(20.0, 40.0)
30.0
(27.0, 49.0)
Best overall response, n (%)
    6 months
        CR 17 (42.5) 11 (73.3) 7 (43.8) 16 (64.0) 8 (44.4) 7 (53.8)
        VGPR 0 2 (13.3) 1 (6.3) 1 (4.0) 1 (5.6) 0
        PR 3 (7.5) 1 (6.7) 1 (6.3) 1 (4.0) 1 (5.6) 1 (7.7)
        Mixed disease 0 0 0 1 (4.0) 1 (5.6) 0
        PD 0 0 1 (6.3) 0 0 0
        No response 2 (5.0) 0 0 0 0 0
        NA/missing 18 (45.0) 1 (6.7) 6 (37.5) 6 (24.0) 7 (38.9) 5 (38.5)
    12 months
        CR 15 (37.5) 12 (80.0) 5 (31.3) 15 (60.0) 8 (44.4) 5 (38.5)
        VGPR 1 (2.5) 1 (6.7) 1 (6.3) 0 0 0
        PR 0 1 (6.7) 1 (6.3) 0 0 0
        Mixed disease 0 0 1 (6.3) 1 (4.0) 1 (5.6) 0
        PD 1 (2.5) 0 0 0 0 0
        No response 1 (2.5) 0 0 0 0 0
        NA/missing 22 (55.0) 1 (6.7) 8 (50.0) 9 (36.0) 9 (50.0) 8 (61.5)
Developed cGVHD, n (%)
    Yes 11 (27.5) 7 (46.7) 6 (37.5) 10 (40.0) 9 (50.0) 3 (23.1)
    NA/missing 4 (10.0) 0 0 0 1 (5.6) 3 (23.1)
aGVHD recurrence, n (%)
    Yes 15 (37.5) 2 (13.3) 4 (25.0) 5 (20.0) 6 (33.3) 3 (23.1)
    NA/missing 0 1 (6.7) 0 0 0 0

aGVHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; cGVHD, chronic graft-versus-host disease; CR, complete response; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; NA, not available; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; VGPR, very good partial response. 1 Twenty-three patients received “other” prophylactic regimens and are not shown in the table.