Table 2. One-way ANOVA for comparison between techniques in each material.
*Significant difference (P<0.05). ANOVA: analysis of variance
Material | Variable | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F | P | |
Polyvinyl siloxane | Error rate for parallel implants (%) | Between techniques | 0.561 | 2 | 0.281 | 2.315 | 0.118 |
Within techniques | 3.272 | 27 | 0.121 | ||||
Total | 3.833 | 29 | |||||
Error rate for angulated implants (%) | Between techniques | 3.825 | 2 | 1.912 | 10.318 | <0.001* | |
Within techniques | 5.005 | 27 | 0.185 | ||||
Total | 8.830 | 29 | |||||
Vinylsiloxanether | Error rate for parallel implants (%) | Between techniques | 0.847 | 2 | 0.424 | 7.142 | 0.003* |
Within techniques | 1.601 | 27 | 0.059 | ||||
Total | 2.449 | 29 | |||||
Error rate for angulated implants (%) | Between techniques | 0.799 | 2 | 0.400 | 1.783 | 0.187 | |
Within techniques | 6.050 | 27 | 0.224 | ||||
Total | 6.849 | 29 |