Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 28;16(4):e59193. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59193

Table 2. One-way ANOVA for comparison between techniques in each material.

*Significant difference (P<0.05). ANOVA: analysis of variance

Material Variable Sum of squares df Mean square F P
Polyvinyl siloxane Error rate for parallel implants (%) Between techniques 0.561 2 0.281 2.315 0.118
Within techniques 3.272 27 0.121    
Total 3.833 29      
Error rate for angulated implants (%) Between techniques 3.825 2 1.912 10.318 <0.001*
Within techniques 5.005 27 0.185    
Total 8.830 29      
Vinylsiloxanether Error rate for parallel implants (%) Between techniques 0.847 2 0.424 7.142 0.003*
Within techniques 1.601 27 0.059    
Total 2.449 29      
Error rate for angulated implants (%) Between techniques 0.799 2 0.400 1.783 0.187
Within techniques 6.050 27 0.224    
Total 6.849 29