Skip to main content
. 2024 May 28;19:313. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04804-x

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Longitudinal evaluation of the functional results. Comparison of range of motion at 12-month follow-up between patients treated with standard rehabilitation protocol (CG) and rehabilitation including continuous passive motion therapy (CPM). Significant differences between the groups were found at the 6 weeks FU for abduction, adduction and forward flexion. Significant differences between timepoints are marked with * (p < 0.05)