Table 3.
Direct effects | B | (SE) | β | 95 % CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bicultural stress | →I-CO | .14 | 7.49 | .66 | [.10, .18]*** |
→L-CO | −.03 | −2.10 | −.26 | [−.05, −.002]* | |
I-CO | →L-TR | .16 | 2.97 | .34 | [.05, .26]** |
L-CO | →L-TR | .01 | .09 | .01 | [−.25, .28] |
I-TR | →Being drunk | −.37 | −5.00 | −.36 | [1.32, 2.88]*** |
L-TR | →Being drunk | 2.10 | 5.27 | .90 | [−.51, −.22]*** |
Covariates | |||||
Location | →Bicultural stress | 3.68 | 1.86 | .12 | [−.18, 7.55] |
→I-CO | −.02 | −.03 | −.003 | [−1.10, 1.06] | |
→L-CO | −.28 | −.75 | −.08 | [−1.00, .44] | |
→I-TR | −.20 | −.15 | −.03 | [−2.84, 2.43] | |
→L-TR | .68 | 1.21 | .23 | [−.42, 1.79] | |
→ Being drunk | .96 | .49 | .14 | [−2.82, 4.74] | |
Age | →Bicultural stress | .45 | .47 | .02 | [−1.44, 2.35] |
→I-CO | .27 | 1.04 | .07 | [−.24, .78] | |
→L-CO | −.24 | −1.29 | −.12 | [−.60, .12] | |
→I-TR | −.94 | −1.16 | −.23 | [−2.54, .65] | |
→L-TR | .30 | .79 | .17 | [−.44, 1.04] | |
→ Being drunk | −.43 | −.37 | −.10 | [−2.71, 1.84] | |
Gender | →Bicultural stress | −3.59 | −1.97 | −.12 | [−7.15, −.02]* |
→I-CO | −1.02 | −2.13 | −.16 | [−1.96, −.08]* | |
→L-CO | .36 | 1.11 | .11 | [−.28, 1.02] | |
→I-TR | −1.07 | −.89 | −.15 | [−3.41, 1.26] | |
→L-TR | −.01 | −.02 | −.005 | [−1.02, .99] | |
→ Being drunk | −.06 | −.04 | −.01 | [−3.05, 2.93] | |
Duration in US | →Bicultural stress | −.28 | −.56 | −.03 | [−1.24, .68] |
→I-CO | .17 | 1.47 | .10 | [−.05, .40] | |
→L-CO | .04 | .45 | .04 | [−.56, .19] | |
→I-TR | .58 | 1.38 | .32 | [−.24, 1.41] | |
→L-TR | −.18 | −.94 | −.23 | [−.56, .19] | |
→ Being drunk | .47 | .82 | .26 | [−.66, 1.60] | |
Prior alcohol use | → Being drunk | .14 | 1.60 | .12 | [−.03, .31] |
Curved covariances | |||||
I-CO ↔ L-CO | −.22 | −.15 | −.06 | – | |
I-CO ↔ I-TR | .59 | .68 | .05 | – | |
I-TR ↔ L-TR | −.35 | −.77 | −.07 | – | |
Mediated effects (α × β; β × γ) | |||||
Bicultural stress → I-CO → L-TR (α × β) | .02 | 3.08 | – | [.01, .03]** | |
I-CO → L-TR → being drunk (β × γ) | .34 | 2.77 | – | [.10, .58]** | |
Multiple mediation effect (α × β; β × γ) | |||||
Bicultural stress → I-CO → L-TR → being drunk | .05 | 2.92 | – | [.01, .08]** |
Model fit for this model was acceptable: χ2 (34) = 48.86, p = .06; CFI = .95; TLI = .91; RMSEA = .04; SRMR = .03
TR tension reduction alcohol expectancies, CO identity confusion, I initial levels, L linear slope
p < .05;
p < .01;
p < .001