Table 3.
Post-intervention participant-reported implementation outcomes for H2H-CHW pilot study (N = 71)
| % Agree or completely agree | % Completely agree | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of intervention measure (AIM) (mean (SD) = 3.5 (0.5)) | ||
| The H2H program was a worthwhile use of my time | 100% | 45% |
| The Heart 2 Heart Blood pressure program met my approval | 100% | 45% |
| The Heart 2 Heart Blood pressure program appealed to me | 99% | 41% |
| I liked the Heart 2 Heart Blood pressure program | 100% | 47% |
| I welcomed the Heart 2 Heart Blood pressure program | 100% | 51% |
| Intervention appropriateness measure (IAM) (mean (SD) = 3.5 (0.5)) | ||
| The Heart 2 Heart Blood pressure program seems fitting for me | 100% | 49% |
| The Heart 2 Heart Blood pressure program seems suitable for me | 100% | 51% |
| The Heart 2 Heart Blood pressure program seems applicable to me | 100% | 46% |
| The Heart 2 Heart Blood pressure program seems like a good match for me | 99% | 46% |
| Feasibility of intervention measure (FIM) (mean (SD) = 3.2 (0.4)) | ||
| The changes I was asked to make were simple to implement. | 93% | 26% |
| The changes I was asked to make were possible | 99% | 29% |
| The changes I was asked to make were doable | 99% | 37% |
| The changes I was asked to make were easy | 87% | 21% |
| Community health worker and program | ||
| My CHW helped me reduce my blood pressure.c | 99% | 38% |
| My CHW helped me set specific goals to improve my blood pressure.c | 100% | 50% |
| My CHW helped me take my medications as prescribed.d | 86% | 36% |
| My CHW helped me understand how to eat healthier.b | 99% | 49% |
| My CHW helped me realize I needed to talk to my doctor about my medications.5 | 82% | 27% |
| My CHW was respectful of my time when scheduling and attending visits.b | 99% | 54% |
| I felt that my CHW cared about my health.c | 100% | 54% |
| I felt like my CHW cared about me as a person.b | 100% | 57% |
| The H2H program provided benefit to me beyond what my doctor provides. | 86% | 32% |
| I didn’t need the H2H program because I already have a doctor (or doctors). | 17% | 6% |
| Church setting | ||
| I participated in the H2H program because it was in my church.c | 96% | 44% |
| I am more likely to participate in a health program that is based in my church than one that is based in my doctor’s office.3 | 79% | 37% |
| The H2H Program was a good fit for my church.b | 100% | 48% |
| Members of my church supported me to reduce my blood pressure.b | 91% | 32% |
| I talked about my blood pressure with others at my church. | 86% | 24% |
| It is important that health programs are offered at church to help manage blood pressure.b | 100% | 49% |
| I expect that my church will provide me with resources to help control my blood pressure. | 79% | 27% |
| Church is not the appropriate setting to address health concerns like blood pressure. | 10% | 7% |
| The heart 2 heart program is a worthwhile use of church resources (time, energy, space). | 100% | 54% |
aMissing 1 observation; bmissing 2 observations; cmissing 3 observations; dmissing 5 observations