Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 15;41(6):2112–2132. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02838-5

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Study ID Country Study design Center Multi/single Sample size Age Median (range) Gender Male n (%) Interventions Outcomes Full text/abstractd
Effectiveness Safety
Controlled study
 Arai 2021 [21] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Multi

108

RAM + PTX: 21

Taxane: 87

63 (25–83) 62 (57.4) RAM + PTX; taxane AEs Full text
 Ishikawa 2020 [26] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Single

128

RAM + PTX: 93

RAM + nab-PTX: 35

RAM + PTX: 67.2 (30–84)

RAM + nab-PTX: 66.6 (34–79)

89 (70) RAM + nab-PTX; RAM + PTX ORR, OS, PFS (RECIST 1.1) AEs (CTCAE 4.0) Full text
 Okunaka 2020a [24]/Okunaka 2020b [23]a Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Single

251

RAM + nab-PTX: 113

RAM + PTX: 138

nab-PTX + RAM: 67 (25–84)

PTX + RAM: 69 (40–85)

166 (66.1) RAM + nab-PTX; RAM + PTX ORR, DCR, OS, PFS (RECIST 1.1) TRAEs (CTCAE 4.0) Full text
 Imazeki 2019 [30] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Multi

154

PTX + RAM: 91

PTX: 63

PTX + RAM: 64

PTX: 64

110 (71.4) RAM + PTX; PTX ORR, DCR, OS, PFS AEs Abstract
 Jung 2018 [34] Korea Retrospective observational study-cohort Multi

265

RAM: 37

RAM + PTX: 228

RAM + PTX: 57 (23–81)

RAM: 62 (35–80)

178 (67.2) RAM + PTX; RAM ORR, DCR, OS, PFS (RECIST 1.1) TRAEs (CTCAE 4.0) Full text
 Masuishi 2018 [32] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Multi

305

RAM + PTX: 127

PTX: 178

RAM + PTX; PTX OS, PFS AEs Abstract
 Shoji 2018 [31] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Single

85

RAM + PTX: 28

PTX: 29

IRI: 28

75 (71–85) RAM + PTX; PTX; IRI ORR, OS, PFS Abstract
 Kusumoto 2017 [38] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort NR

RAM + PTX: 18

PTX: NR

RAM + PTX; PTX ORR, DCR, OS, PFS AEs Abstract
Non-controlled study
 Sakai 2017 [36]b Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Single

RAM + PTX: 20

RAM: 2

RAM + PTX; RAM PFS Abstract
 Han 2021 [20] Korea Retrospective observational study-cohort Multi 1063 60 (1–88) 724 (68.1) RAM + PTX ORR, DCR, OS, PFS (RECIST 1.1) TRAEs (CTCAE 5.0) Full text
 Hashida 2021 [19] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Single 43 70 (36–90) 28 (65.1) RAM + nab-PTX ORR, DCR, OS, PFS (RECIST 1.1) AEs (CTCAE 4.0) Full text
 Komatsu 2021 [18] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Multi 3650 2677 (73.3) RAM + taxane (PTX or nab-PTX) Full text
 Kim 2020 [25] Korea Prospective observational study-cohort NR 116 58 (47–63) 71 (61.2) RAM + PTX ORR, DCR, OS, PFS (RECIST 1.1) Full text
 Sasaki 2020 [22] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Single 149 106 (71.1) RAM + taxane (PTX or nab-PTX) ORR, DCR, PFS (RECIST 1.1) TRAEs (CTCAE 5.0) Full text
 Kashiwada 2019a [29] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Single 41 RAM + PTX OS, PFS Abstract
 Kashiwada 2019b [28] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Single 14 RAM + nab-PTX ORR, DCR, PFS TRAEs Abstract
 Natsume 2019 [27] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Single 26 67 (40–81) 8 (30.8) RAM or RAM + PTX ORR, OS, PFS (Subgroup- PlGF-low, PlGF-high)c (RECIST 1.1) Full text
 Fukuda 2018 [35] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Single 89 67 (35–83) 47 (52.8) RAM + PTX ORR, DCR, OS, PFS (RECIST 1.1) TRAEs (CTCAE 4.0) Full text
 Kusumoto 2018 [33] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Single 25 RAM + PTX ORR, DCR, OS, PFS AEs Abstract
 Matsumoto 2017 [37] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort Single 37 RAM + PTX ORR, OS, PFS AEs Abstract
 Lim 2016 [41] Korea Retrospective observational study-cohort NR 70 RAM + PTX ORR, DCR, PFS Abstract
 Shinohara 2016 [40] Japan Retrospective observational study-case series NR 8 RAM + PTX ORR AEs (CTCAE 4.0) Abstract
 Tozawa 2016 [39] Japan Retrospective observational study-cohort NR 20 RAM + PTX PFS Abstract

AEs adverse events, CTCAE Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version, DCR disease control rate, IRI irinotecan, nab-PTX albumin-bound paclitaxel, NR not reported, ORR objective response rate, OS overall survival, PFS profession-free survival, PTX paclitaxel, RAM ramucirumab, RECIST response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, TRAEs treatment-related adverse events

aOkunaka 2020a (full text) and Okunaka 2020b (conference abstract) were multiple reports of the same study, and only the outcome data from Okunaka 2020a were included in the data analysis

bAlthough patients in Sakai 2017 received RAM or RAM + PTX, no result was reported in the original study about patients receiving RAM, so in this SLR, we deemed it non-controlled study

cData from Natsume 2019 were not included in the analysis because although patients were treated with RAM or RAM + PTX, no separate results were reported by intervention

dAll abstract studies were conference abstracts derived from the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) Annual Meeting, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress, the ESMO World Congress on Gastrointestinal (GI) Cancer, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, the ASCO Symposium on GI Cancer, and the Asia Pacific Digestive Week (APDW) Innovative Approaches to Gastroenterology