Skip to main content
. 2024 May 28;40(1):139. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05729-6

Table 1.

Comparison between testes operated on with inguinal or scrotal approach regarding demographics, pathogenesis, and surgical factors at primary surgery

Total (n = 662) Inguinal approach (n = 469) Scrotal approach (n = 193) p value
Age at surgery (months) 63.7 (± 48.2) 61.3 (± 49.9) 69.6 (± 43.4) 0.033*
Bilaterality 240 (36.3%) 137 (29.2%) 103 (53.4%)  < 0.001**
Genetic syndrome 30 (4.5%) 29 (6.2%) 1 (0.52%) 0.001**
Premature 36 (5.4%) 29 (6.2%) 7 (3.6%) 0.187*
Congenital 245 (37.0%) 207 (44.1%) 38 (19.7%)  < 0.001**
Right side 375 (56.6%) 259 (55.2%) 116 (60.1%) 0.250*
Sutured to scrotal sac 316 (47.8%) 290 (61.8%) 26 (13.5%)  < 0.001**
External oblique divided 369 (55.7%) 369 (78.7%) 0 N/A
Operation time (min)a 41.4 (± 19.4) 48.3 (± 18.1) 25.5 (± 11.4)  < 0.001**
Patent processus vaginalis 368 (55.6%) 284 (60.1%) 84 (43.5%)  < 0.001**
Scrotal hypoplasia 189 (28.5%) 136 (29.0%) 53 (27.5%) 0.691**

Values presented as mean (± SD) and the absolute number and percentage of patients

a38 patients with missing data

*Student’s t test, **Chi-square