Table 2.
Results of the ablation study of the optimized model in our dataset.
CBAM | GELU | EfficiCIoU | P | R | mAP@0.5 | mAP@0.5:0.95 | FPS | Params | GFLOPs | Time | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.891 | 0.833 | 0.941 | 0.725 | 66 | 7.02 | 16.01 | 0.0091 | ||||||
√ | 0.910 | 0.890 | 0.949 | 0.729 | 52 | 11.32 | 19.94 | 0.0107 | |||||
√ | 0.899 | 0.857 | 0.943 | 0.721 | 67 | 8.33 | 13.71 | 0.0100 | |||||
√ | 0.899 | 0.855 | 0.950 | 0.727 | 58 | 8.45 | 14.10 | 0.0123 | |||||
√ | √ | 0.919 | 0.891 | 0.956 | 0.732 | 48 | 11.76 | 20.00 | 0.0128 | ||||
√ | √ | 0.920 | 0.893 | 0.943 | 0.737 | 48 | 12.00 | 20.92 | 0.0147 | ||||
√ | √ | 0.904 | 0.889 | 0.947 | 0.730 | 54 | 9.11 | 15.88 | 0.0111 | ||||
√ | √ | √ | 0.933 | 0.896 | 0.963 | 0.740 | 47 | 12.01 | 21.69 | 0.0150 |