Skip to main content
. 2024 May 28;14:12164. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62378-4

Table 4.

Comparable investigation for Cr (VI) onto ATP–CPBr@CA composite beads and other reported adsorbents.

Adsorbent qmax (mg/g) Eq. time (min) Refs.
MAC–ATP composite 119.62 120 39
FCA/SiO2 membrane 19.45 40 40
Fe3O4/ZIF-67@AmCs beads 119.05 80 41
ATP–supported nZVI composite 266.65 720 42
TEPA-Alg beads 77.00 180 43
Fe3O4-coated CA/CS nanofibers 193.20 300 46
CA–PCL/CS nanofiber 126.00 150 49
ATP–CPBr@CA composite beads 302 120 This study