Skip to main content
. 2024 May 15;12:1372430. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1372430

Table 5.

Evaluation of the implementation effect of labor education for college students (China, 2023, n = 27).

Question Before After Before vs. After
Male Female Male Female
n 12 15 12 15
Q1 Do you feel there is a lot of waste in the cafeteria? Not serious 2 1 4 1
A little serious, but acceptable 6 12 7 9
More serious and requires measures 4 2 1 5
It does not matter 0 0 0 0
Z −0.528 −2.050 −0.423
P 0.598 0.040* 0.672
Q2 What is your level of food waste per meal? Almost no waste 9 2 7 2
Waste a little (<10%) 1 8 3 8
Less waste (10–30%) 2 3 2 4
Comparatively large amount of waste (30–50%) 0 2 0 1
Large amount of waste (>50%) 0 0 0 0
Z −2.690 −2.126 −0.303
P 0.007* 0.034* 0.762
Q3 How often do you waste food each week? 0–1 time per week 11 4 11 5
2–3 times per week 1 5 1 6
4–5 times per week 0 4 0 3
More than 5 times per week 0 2 0 1
Z −3.324 −3.023 −0.456
P 0.001* 0.003* 0.648
Q4 Do you feel self-conscious about the waste caused by leftovers? Regularly 7 3 8 7
Occasionally 5 10 4 7
Not usually 0 2 0 1
Not at all 0 0 0 0
Z −2.185 −1.118 −1.363
P 0.029* 0.264 0.173
Q5 What is your attitude toward your classmates wasting food? Stop it now 1 2 4 4
I do not like it, but I’m too embarrassed to stop it 4 3 6 5
It does not matter. It’s normal 2 3 0 0
It’s someone else’s business 5 4 0 3
I’ll tell the student privately 0 3 2 3
χ 2 4.621 4.117 13.831
P 0.328 0.249 0.008*
Q6 Do you think the signs posted on the cafeteria about saving food work for you? It does not work at all 2 3 0 0
It works a little bit 2 4 1 6
Sometimes it works 4 7 5 2
Serve a valuable purpose 4 1 6 7
Z −1.177 −0.897 −2.274
P 0.239 0.370 0.023*

The results were shown as frequency. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Mann–Whitney U test. *p < 0.05 compared to the control group.