Skip to main content
. 2024 May 28;26:85. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01846-1

Table 2.

Diagnostic accuracy of readers by group* and by attendance or non-attendance at previous in person FAST MRI interpretation-training

Category Measure
Concordance (Accuracy) True positive rate (Sensitivity) True negative rate (Specificity) Kappa (95% CI) Diagnostic odds ratio (95% CI)
All readers 9800/10746 (91%) 1994/2408 (83%) 7806/8338 (94%) 0.75 (0.74–0.77) 70.67 (61.59–81.09)
Reader group*
Group 1* 5065/5498 (92%) 1034/1232 (84%) 4031/4266 (94%) 0.77 (0.76–0.80) 89.58 (73.26–109.52)
Group 2* 4735/5248 (90%) 960/1176 (82%) 3775/4072 (93%) 0.73 (0.70–0.75) 56.49 (46.76–68.25)
Attendance at previous in person FAST MRI interpretation training
Attended 4123/4500 (92%) 876/1008 (87%) 3247/3492 (93%) 0.77 (0.75–0.79) 87.95 (70.27–110.08)
Not attended 5677/6246 (91%) 1118/1400 (80%) 4559/4846 (94%) 0.74 (0.72–0.76) 62.98 (52.77–75.16)
Reader group* and attendance at previous in person FAST MRI interpretation training
Group 1* Attended 1613/1750 (92%) 533/616 (87%) 2002/2134 (94%) 0.78 (0.75–0.81) 97.40 (72.83–130.25)
Group 1* Not attended 2530/2748 (92%) 501/616 (81%) 2029/2132 (95%) 0.77 (0.74–0.80) 85.82 (64.65–113.93)
Group 2* Attended 1588/1750 (91%) 343/392 (88%) 1245/1358 (92%) 0.75 (0.71–0.78) 77.12 (54.03–110.09)
Group 2* Not attended 3147/3498 (90%) 617/784 (79%) 2530/2714 (93%) 0.71 (0.69–0.74) 50.80 (40.48–63.76)

* Reader group: group 1 = experience of fpMRI interpretation in their usual clinical practice, group 2 = no previous experience of breast MRI interpretation in their clinical practice