Table 4.
Diagnostic accuracy within the current study in comparison to previous training results from the two studies that used in-person versions of the same standardised training programme and assessment dataset (delivered as one-to-one(13) or small group(11) training)
| Category | Measure | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| True positive rate (Sensitivity) (95%CI) | True negative rate (Specificity) (95%CI) | Concordance with the true outcome (Accuracy) (95% CI) | Kappa (95% CI) | Diagnostic odds ratio (95% CI) | |
| Current Study: All readers | 83% (81–84) | 94% (93–94) | 91% (91–92) | 0.75 (0.74–0.77) | 70.67 (61.59–81.09) |
| One to one training (13) | 88% (84–91) | 87% (85–89) | 87% (86–89) | 0.69 (0.65–0.72) | 48.30 (35.12–66.44) |
| Small group training (11) | 86% (84–87) | 86% (85–86) | 86% (85–87) | 0.63 (0.61–0.65) | 35.49 (30.87–40.81) |