(A) Schematic representation of the fate of glucose in glycolysis. The tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle or lactate secretion via monocarboxylate transporters (MCT) can be inhibited, either using NaN3 or BAY-8002. GLUT: Glucose transporter, HKs: Hexokinases. (B) Representative cytosolic lactate concentration ([LAC]cyto) of a MMTV-PyMT WT cell over-time in response to administration or removal of NaN3 and BAY-8002 at time points indicated. Dashed lines indicate slopes taken for assessment of the ‘Warburg index’. (C – G) Average Warburg indices ± SEM of MMTV-PyMT WT (C, F, left), MMTV-PyMT BK-KO (C, F, right), MDA-MB-453 cells (D, G) and MCF-7 cells (E) calculated from the experiments as shown in (B), either under control conditions, in the presence of paxilline or iberiotoxin (C, D), upon expression of BKCaRFP or BKCa-DECRFP (E), or upon cell treatment with a scrambled siRNA (siScrbl), or siRNA against a common BKCa sequence targeting all known splice variants (siBK), or a siRNA specifically designed to knockdown BKCa-DEC (siDEC) (F, G). (H, I) Normalized MTT absorbance over-time of MMTV-PyMT WT (H, left) and BK-KO cells (H, right), and MDA-MB-453 cells (I), either under control conditions, or in the presence of paxilline or iberiotoxin. (J), Representative images and corresponding statistics of colony formation assays using MMTV-PyMT WT or BK-KO cells in the presence or absence of O2. (K – N) mRNA expression of BKCa and BKCa-DEC as performed by Nanostring analysis of 551 BC patient samples. (K) Log2 expression counts of BKCa and BKCa-DEC. The threshold for positive expression level was set to log2 = 5.5 (dashed line). (L) Log2 expression counts of BKCa-DEC blotted over the log2 expression counts of BKCa. 10 of the 551 patient samples showed expression of BKCa-DEC above the threshold of log2 = 5.5 (dashed line), whereas 541 patient samples were BKCa-DEC negative. (M) Correlation of the log2 expression counts of BKCa-DEC positive samples with the log2 expression counts of BKCa in the primary human BC material. (N) Summarizing scheme of BKCa in cancer cell homeostasis. N (independent experiments) / n (cells analyzed) = (C): 4/26 WT ctrl, 6/28 WT +PAX, 4/39 WT +IBTX, 4/17 BK-KO ctrl, 5/18 BK-KO +PAX, 4/27 BK-KO +IBTX, (D): 7/29 ctrl, 5/13+PAX, (E): 5/27 ctrl, 5/20+BKCaRFP, 7/26 BKCa-DECRFP, (F): 5/22 WT siScrbl, 5/28 WT siBK, 4/26 WT siDEC, 5/24 BK-KO siScrbl, 5/24 BK-KO siBK, 5/29 BK-KO siDEC, (G): 5/21 siScrbl, 5/22 siBK, 5/19 siDEC, (H – J): 4 for all. *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s MC test (C, E, F, G, I), One-Way ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s MC test (H) or Mann-Whitney test (D). †p≤0.01, ‡p≤0.001 compared to respective WT condition, Unpaired t-test ctrl, (C, J) or Mann-Whitney test (+IBTX, C, F).
Figure 6—source data 1. Numerical values underlying the data shown in Figure 6.