Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 29.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2023 Oct 1;14223:194–205. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-43901-8_19

Table 1.

Quantitative comparison (DSC[%]/ASD[voxel]) for LA under two unlabeled settings (5% or 10%). All experiments are conducted as [42,16,19,20,30,29,36] in the identical setting for fair comparisons. The best results are indicated in bold. VNet-F (fully-supervided) and VNet-L (semi-supervided) are considered as the upper bound and the lower bound for the performance comparison.

4 Labeled (5%) 8 Labeled (10%)
Method DSC[%]↑ ASD[voxel]↓ DSC[%]↑ ASD[voxel]↓
VNet-F [21] 91.5 1.51 91.5 1.51
VNet-L 52.6 9.87 82.7 3.26
UAMT [42] 82.3 3.82 87.8 2.12
SASSNet [16] 81.6 3.58 87.5 2.59
DTC [19] 81.3 2.70 87.5 2.36
URPC [20] 82.5 3.65 86.9 2.28
MC-Net [30] 83.6 2.70 87.6 1.82
SS-Net [29] 86.3 2.31 88.6 1.90
ACTION [36] 86.6 2.24 88.7 2.10
ACTION++ (ours) 87.8 2.09 89.9 1.74