Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 5;271(6):3239–3255. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12261-z

Table 1.

Demographic details of the study population

PLS HC PLS vs HC t-test +/Chi-square test++
Number of subjects at baseline (T1/dMRI/rs-fMRI) 43 (43/41/39) 113 (113/113/111) n.a
Number of subjects at Time-point 2 (T1/ dMRI/rs-fMRI) 8 (30/29/27) 18 (18/18/18) n.a
Number of subjects at Time-point 3 (T1/ dMRI/rs-fMRI) 7 (25/25/23) 13 (13/13/13) n.a
Number of subjects at Time-point 4 (T1/ dMRI/rs-fMRI) 3 (20/19/15) 8 (8/8/8) n.a
Age [y, mean ± SD] 55.50 ± 9.05 59.36 ± 10.66

t(80.33) = 1.33,

p = .188

Years of education [y, mean ± SD] 12.18 ± 3.25 14.77 ± 3.46

t(71.04) =  – 4.05,

p = .001*

Sex, F/M 16/27 57/56

X2(1, N = 156) = 1.69,

p = .193

Handedness, R/L 39/4 106/7

X2(1, N = 156) = 0.11,

p = .736

Years of symptom duration [y, mean ± SD] 109.75 ± 70.46 n.a n.a

#Follow-up scans were acquired with an inter-scan interval of four months

dMRI diffusion-weighted imaging, F female, rs-fMRI resting-state functional MRI, HC healthy control, L left-handed, M male, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, n.a. not applicable / not available, PLS primary lateral sclerosis, R right-handed, SD standard deviation, y years

+Welch two-sample t-tests [t] were performed to test differences of age and years of education between all PLS vs. HC

++Chi-square tests [X2] were performed to test differences of sex and handedness frequencies between all PLS patients vs. HC

*significant at an alpha-level of p ≤ 0.05