Editor—Gulmezoglu and Duley state that although magnesium sulphate is acknowledged as the preferred anticonvulsant for eclamptic women, there is little evidence to support or refute the use of anticonvulsants in pre-eclampsia.1 However, a large placebo controlled randomised trial on the use of magnesium sulphate in severe pre-eclampsia has recently been published.2
Magnesium sulphate was found to be highly effective in severe pre-eclampsia (relative risk 0.09, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.69).2 The risk of seizures without magnesium sulphate was 3.2%, and the number of women with severe pre-eclampsia who needed to be treated with magnesium sulphate to prevent one case of eclampsia was 34. Previous studies have compared the efficacy of magnesium sulphate with that of phenytoin. Based on this evidence and using a framework for making therapeutic decisions,3 obstetricians were willing to treat pre-eclamptic women with magnesium sulphate when the risk of seizures was above 2.5% and 1.75% in two UK studies (the corresponding numbers needed to treat were 57 and 77).4,5
Coetzee et al showed that the risk of seizures without magnesium sulphate was above this risk threshold (3.2%) and that the number needed to treat (34) was below the threshold for this criterion.2 There should therefore be no uncertainty about the role and choice of magnesium sulphate as a prophylactic anticonvulsant in cases of severe pre-eclampsia that warrant delivery. Moreover, further trials of magnesium sulphate versus placebo in women with severe pre-eclampsia should be unnecessary.
References
- 1.Gulmezoglu AM, Duley L. Use of anticonvulsants in eclampsia and pre-eclampsia: survey of obstetricians in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. BMJ. 1998;316:975–976. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7136.975. . (28 March.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Coetzee EJ, Dommisse J, Anthony J. A randomised controlled trial of intravenous magnesium sulphate versus placebo in the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:300–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair J, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users guide to the medical literature: method of grading health care recommendations. JAMA. 1995;274:1800–1804. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.22.1800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Khan KS, Chien PFW. Seizure prophylaxis in hypertensive pregnancies: a framework for making clinical decisions. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:1173–1179. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10942.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Owen P. Seizure prophylaxis in hypertensive pregnancies: a framework for making clinical decisions. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:371. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10111.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]