Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 7;14(4):312–318. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102309

Table 2.

Impact of achievement of clinical and endoscopic targets on subsequent disease course

Endoscopic target Frequency observed,
n (%)
Risk of treatment failure* if target not achieved (logrank HR, 95% CI) P value Risk of corticosteroids, admission or surgery if target not achieved (logrank HR, 95% CI) P value Risk of surgery if target not achieved (logrank HR, 95% CI) P value
SES-CD 2 25 (50) 11.62 (3.33 to 40.56) 0.003 5.74 (1.16 to 28.56) 0.07 3.44 (0.48 to 24.53) 0.25
Absence of ulcers 28 (56) 6.45 (1.80 to 23.09) 0.007 2.80 (0.55 to 14.18) 0.23 4.21 (0.58 to 30.73) 0.18
>50% reduction in SES-CD 35 (70) 30.30 (6.93 to 132.40) <0.0001 13.74 (2.25 to 83.84) 0.002 8.28 (0.90 to 76.02) 0.03†
SES-CD 3 32 (64) 24.13 (5.99 to 97.20) <0.0001 11.21 (1.98 to 63.40) 0.005 6.68 (0.81 to 55.64) 0.06
Combined remission
(SES-CD 2 and HBI <5)
19 (38) 6.78 (1.94 to 23.70) 0.04 2.69 (0.53 to 13.74) 0.23 2.26 (0.38 to 13.57) 0.37
Combined remission
(SES-CD 3 and HBI <5)
24 (48) 11.07 (3.18 to 38.49) 0.004 5.43 (1.10 to 26.95) 0.08 3.15 (0.44 to 22.35) 0.29

Bold values signify statistical significance (p value 0.05).

*Treatment failure defined as the need for: (1) change of biological therapy for active disease (2) corticosteroid use (3) CD-related hospitalisation or (4) surgery.

†Non-significant due to 95% CI.

HBI, Harvey Bradshaw Index; SES-CD, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease.