Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 27;25(6):764–770. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae054

Table 3.

Comparison of 185 IVF patients with and without inferolateral MAD

IVF patients with inferolateral MAD (n = 24) IVF patients without inferolateral MAD (n = 161) P-value
Age, yearsa 29 (22, 49)] 39 (28, 53) 0.140
Female, n (%) 10 (42%) 64 (40%) 0.858
History of syncope, n (%) 3/18 (17%) 16/149 (11%) 0.436
History of palpitations, n (%) 3/18 (17%) 18/149 (12%) 0.704
Family history of SCDb, n (%) 2/20 (10%) 20/150 (13%) 1.000
Arrhythmia characteristics
 Inverted/biphasic T-waves inferior, n (%) 9 (38%) 25/159 (16%) 0.021
 High PVC burden, n (%) 16 (67%) 36 (23%) <0.001
  Multi-form PVCs 9/15 (60%) 12/31 (39%) 0.174
 Non-sustained VT, n (%) 15 (63%) 62/152 (41%) 0.046
 Appropriate ICD therapy, n (%) 3 (13%) 29 (18%) 0.579
 Death, n (%) 0 (0%) 3 (2%) 1.000
CMR characteristics
 LVEF, %c 55 (±7) 58 (±8) 0.108
 Mitral valve prolapse, n (%) 10 (42%) 3 (2%) <0.001
 MAD present in multiple areas, n (%) 20 (83%) 33 (21%) <0.001
 LGE present, n (%) 2/23 (9%) 11/145 (8%) 0.693

CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; IVF, idiopathic ventricular fibrillation; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillation; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MAD, mitral annular disjunction; SCD, sudden cardiac death; PVC, premature ventricular complexes; VT, ventricular tachycardia.

aValues are presented as median (interquartile range).

bDefinition as used in Table 1.

cValues are presented as mean (standard deviation).