Skip to main content
. 2024 May 30;11:558. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03408-8

Table 1.

Example observations of diel distributions in richness and abundance in insect communities derived from the insect diel activity dataset.

Country Latitude Habitat Taxa Observed richness Observed abundance Study
Total D N Total D N
Borneo 4.90 forest Formicidae (ants) 92 82 76 91128 48725 42403 Grevé et al.33
Brazil −22.57 forest Culicidae (mosquitoes) 63 47 39 933 571 362 Alencar et al.34
Hungary 48.32 river Chironomidae (midges) 61 55 50 42479 8559 33920 Móra et al.35
Botswana −20.45 forest Scarabaeoidea (dung beetles) 48 14 35 13032 206 12826 Sands et al.29
Russia 55.45 forest Carabidae (ground beetles) 14 14 14 1677 797 880 Gryuntal et al.36
Brazil −8.07 forest Calliphoridae (blowflies) 6 6 2 1700 1634 66 Soares et al.22
USA 43.82 pond Heteroptera (water bugs) 3 3 3 NA NA NA Hampton & Friedenberg37

Presented are observations of seven taxonomic communities from different parts of the world. Observations of richness are in terms of species, while observations of abundance are in terms of individuals. The values correspond to the total number of species or individuals observed across both diel periods (‘Total’), during the day (‘D’), or during the night (‘N’). Note: in addition to the variables presented here, a variety of environmental variables as well as sample-based values for observations are available in the dataset (see main text).