| Katie B. et al.21
|
Cross-sectional |
No significant associations found between transactional sex and economic or healthcare-related barriers to PrEP use |
| Susan A. et al.23
|
Cross-sectional |
Black race and perceived HIV discrimination were significantly associated with awareness and higher PrEP acceptability. |
| Sarit A et al.27
|
Cross-sectional qualitative study |
Black and Latino MTWSM were more likely to mention HIV related stereotypes and significantly less likely to mention promiscuity than white MTWSM. |
| Catherine E et al.30
|
Cross-sectional quantitative assessment |
Stimulant using MTWSM were more likely to be concerned about substance use affecting PrEP adherence than alcohol using MTWSM. Similarly, stimulant using MTWSM were less concerned about HIV stigma as a barrier to PrEP uptake than alcohol users. |
| Sarit A et al.32
|
Cross-sectional |
Black Latino MTWSM were more likely to consider talking to a doctor about their sex life as a barrier to PrEP uptake and were less likely to endorse agency in medical decision-making. |
| Sarit A et al.24
|
Cross-sectional |
Anticipated HIV stigma was strongly associated with decreased HIV testing. |
| Moctezuma G et al.25
|
Cross-sectional |
Overall, there is a significant association between PrEP awareness and age, education and income levels. |
| Catherine E et al.31
|
Cross-sectional |
There is an association between lower structural stigma and decreased odds of condomless anal intercourse and increased odds of having heard of or taken PEP and PrEP. |
| Lisa A et al.26
|
Cross-sectional |
There is a strong association between PrEP being related to promiscuity and lack of interest in PrEP use. |