Abstract
Background: Digital eye strain (DES) has become a pervasive issue in contemporary society due to increased reliance on electronic devices. This study aims to comprehensively explore the symptoms, severity, and associated factors of DES, considering demographic, behavioral, and health-related variables.
Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted among participants with diverse demographic backgrounds. A structured questionnaire collected data on participant characteristics, electronic device usage patterns, symptoms of DES, and its impact on various aspects of quality of life. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests, were employed to assess associations and significance.
Results: The majority of participants reported symptoms of DES, with eye dryness, headache, and eye redness being the most prevalent. Symptom severity varied, with age, daily device usage, adherence to the 20-20-20 rule, and studying with electronic devices demonstrating statistically significant associations. Participants diagnosed with eye diseases exhibited higher symptom severity. While disagreement was common regarding DES increasing stress, a substantial proportion acknowledged its impact on productivity and attention.
Conclusion: The current study showed that there is a significant correlation between the incidence of digital eye straining and longer screen exposure time. The findings underscore the importance of age, behavior, and ocular health in understanding and addressing DES. The results contribute to the broader discourse on digital eye health and emphasize the need for targeted interventions to alleviate the impact of DES on daily life.
Keywords: eye strain factors, digital and eye, digital eye strain symptoms, eye strain, digital eye strain
Introduction
A group of eye- and vision-related issues caused by extended use of a computer, tablet, e-reader, or mobile phone is referred to as computer vision syndrome, also known as digital eye strain (DES) [1,2]. When observing digital screens for prolonged durations, many people endure eye irritation and visual issues. With more time spent on digital screens, pain levels seem to increase [3,4].
Due to its special features and demanding visual requirements, using a digital screen or computer can result in vision-related complaints [1]. The intensity of computer vision syndrome (CVS) or what is also known as DES symptoms might be exacerbated by untreated visual issues. Possible exacerbating factors include computer screen's lettering, when the contrast is lower, and challenging view due to glare and reflections [1]. This work requires different viewing distances and angles than are often utilized for other reading or writing tasks. Uncorrected or inadequately fixed vision issues can significantly contribute to CVS. This will mostly lead to several symptoms related to vision and probably musculoskeletal issues [1]. These symptoms include headaches, impaired vision, and dry eyes. Many risk factors may contribute to these symptoms, including bad lighting, uncorrected refractive problems, glare on the digital screen, and an insufficient viewing distance. This syndrome can be caused by one or more of several factors. DES symptoms are usually reduced by getting regular eye care and changing how the screen is viewed. For example, customized spectacles may be provided to address the unique visual demands of computer viewing [1].
In another study conducted to estimate the prevalence of CVS among university medical students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 94.0% reported at least one symptom of CVS, with 67% reporting more than three symptoms. CVS is common among medical students during COVID-19. This demands a greater understanding of CVS and its preventive actions [5]. Therefore, in this study, we aim to assess CVS prevalence, awareness, risk factors, and effect on quality of life among Riyadh City university students in Saudi Arabia.
Materials and methods
The study was conducted in Saudi Arabia, spanning from September 2023 to October 2023, with a focus on Riyadh City universities. The target population included all students at the university, and participant information was kept confidential in accordance with ethical approval.
All students enrolled at Riyadh City universities were eligible for participation without restrictions based on age or other specifications. Excluded from the study were individuals who were not registered as students at Riyadh City universities.
An analytical retrospective cross-sectional approach was employed, utilizing a questionnaire-based survey. Data collection took place through an online survey distributed via university email and various social media platforms in Saudi Arabia. The survey link facilitated the retrieval of the required information.
The study determined a sample size of 253 to achieve a 96% confidence level with a 4% margin of error. An additional 20% was added to the sample size to ensure an adequate response rate, resulting in a final sample of 209 Riyadh University students. A convenient non-probability sampling method was employed, including individuals meeting the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The research approval was obtained from King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) through Princess Nourah University (HAP-01-R-059).
The data were managed and analyzed using SPSS version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Descriptive statistics were applied to present categorical data, including percentages and frequencies, such as gender distribution. The relative risk was calculated to assess risks, along with the determination of confidence intervals. Logistic regression was utilized to evaluate potential risk factors. A significance level of 0.05 was set, considering the test as significant if the p-value fell below this threshold.
Results
Table 1 outlines the demographic characteristics of the study participants. The majority of respondents were female (81.8%), with males accounting for 18.2%. Regarding age distribution, 76.6% fell within the 18-25 age range, while 21.1% were aged 26-35, and 2.4% were in the 36-45 age group. The distribution of participants across different colleges varied, with medical colleges having the highest representation at 35.4%. The majority of respondents held a bachelor’s degree (90.0%), followed by master’s degree holders (7.7%). In terms of daily sleeping duration, 50.2% reported sleeping for five to six hours, while 39.7% slept for six hours or more daily. Notably, 10.0% of the participants reported sleeping for less than four hours. A significant portion (51.2%) reported never using the 20-20-20 rule for screen time, while 50.2% adhered to a five-to-six-hour daily screen time. A majority of participants (89.5%) did not smoke. Concerning eye health, the majority reported never being diagnosed with any eye disease (31.6%). Refractive eye disorders were prevalent (37.3%), followed by eye dryness (30.1%) (Table 1).
Table 1. Demographic factors of the participants.
N: Frequency of the participants.
N%: Corresponding percentages.
Variables | N (N = 209) | N % | |
Gender | Male | 38 | 18.2% |
Female | 171 | 81.8% | |
Age (years) | 18-25 | 160 | 76.6% |
26-35 | 44 | 21.1% | |
36-45 | 5 | 2.4% | |
College | Medical colleges | 76 | 35.4% |
Computer science | 41 | 19.6% | |
Early childhood college | 1 | 0.5% | |
Law college | 6 | 2.9% | |
Faculty of Education | 19 | 9.1% | |
College of languages | 8 | 3.8% | |
Science | 9 | 4.3% | |
College of Business Administration | 13 | 6.2% | |
Engineering specializations | 11 | 5.3% | |
Arts and culture | 9 | 4.3% | |
Graphic science | 7 | 3.3% | |
College of Sports and Physical Activity | 6 | 2.9% | |
College of Literature | 3 | 2.4% | |
Educational level | Diploma | 5 | 2.4% |
Bachelor's | 188 | 90.0% | |
Master | 16 | 7.7% | |
Daily sleeping duration | <4 hours | 21 | 10.0% |
5-6 hours | 105 | 50.2% | |
6 hours or more | 83 | 39.7% | |
Do you use the 20-20-20 rule (for every 20 minutes a person looks at the screen, they have to look at something 20 feet away for 20 seconds)? | Never | 107 | 51.2% |
Rarely | 30 | 14.4% | |
Sometime | 55 | 26.3% | |
Usually | 14 | 6.7% | |
Always | 3 | 1.4% | |
Do you use lubricating eye drops? | Never | 49 | 23.4% |
Rarely | 41 | 19.6% | |
Sometime | 69 | 33.0% | |
Usually | 35 | 16.7% | |
Always | 15 | 7.2% | |
Smoking | No | 187 | 89.5% |
Yes | 22 | 10.5% | |
Diagnosis with eye condition | Never diagnosed with any eye disease | 66 | 31.6% |
Refractive eye disorders (such as nearsightedness and farsightedness) | 78 | 37.3% | |
Eye dryness | 63 | 30.1% | |
squint | 18 | 8.6% | |
Conjunctivitis | 13 | 6.2% |
Electronic device usage patterns are detailed in Table 2. The most common number of daily devices used was two (42.1%), and a majority (64.1%) reported always studying with electronic devices. Entertainment (54.1%) and reading (59.8%) were the most common uses of electronic devices. The majority (41.6%) reported using devices for six to eight hours per day. Regarding caffeinated beverage consumption, 39.2% reported consuming two cups daily, while 22.0% reported drinking one cup daily (Table 2).
Table 2. Electronic devices pattern of use.
N: Number of counts (or frequency).
N%: Corresponding percentages to the count.
Variables | Pattern | Count (N) | Column (N %) |
What is the total number of devices you use daily (including phones, tablets, laptops, computers, etc.)? | One | 11 | 5.3% |
Two | 88 | 42.1% | |
Three | 85 | 40.7% | |
Four | 16 | 7.7% | |
Five | 5 | 2.4% | |
6 or more | 4 | 1.9% | |
Do you study using electronic devices (iPad, tablet, Kindle, laptop, etc.)? | Never | 2 | 1.0% |
Rarely | 7 | 3.3% | |
Sometimes | 44 | 21.1% | |
Usually | 22 | 10.5% | |
Always | 134 | 64.1% | |
Uses of electronic devices | Searching | 108 | 51.7% |
Reading | 125 | 59.8% | |
Data analysis | 22 | 10.5% | |
Technology-related work | 47 | 22.5% | |
Programming | 40 | 19.1% | |
Writing | 104 | 49.8% | |
Education | 7 | 3.3% | |
Data entry | 41 | 19.6% | |
Entertainment | 113 | 54.1% | |
How many hours do you use your devices per day (total)? | 1-3 hour | 9 | 4.3% |
3-6 hours | 43 | 20.6% | |
6-8 hours | 87 | 41.6% | |
More than 8 hours | 70 | 33.5% | |
How many cups of caffeinated beverages (tea, coffee, energy drinks, soft drinks) do you drink daily? | Never | 28 | 13.4% |
One | 46 | 22.0% | |
Two | 82 | 39.2% | |
Three | 35 | 16.7% | |
Four or higher | 18 | 8.6% |
Table 3 further characterized digital eye straining based on reported symptoms. The majority of participants (67.0%) reported experiencing one to five symptoms, while 30.1% reported six to 10 symptoms. Only a small percentage (2.4%) reported no symptoms, and 0.5% reported more than 11 symptoms. Concerning frequency, most participants reported experiencing symptoms at varying intervals, with 40.2% reporting one to two times weekly and 17.2% reporting three to four times weekly (Table 3).
Table 3. Characteristics of digital eye straining.
N indicates the count or frequency of the variable.
N% indicates the representing percentage of the count (N).
Variables | Count (N) | Column (N%) | |
Symptoms | No symptoms | 5 | 2.4% |
1-5 symptoms | 140 | 67.0% | |
6-10 symptoms | 63 | 30.1% | |
>11 symptoms | 1 | 0.5% | |
How frequent are the above symptoms? | Never having symptoms | 5 | 2.4% |
Rarely (Less than 3 times monthly) | 62 | 29.7% | |
1-2 times weekly | 84 | 40.2% | |
3-4 times weekly | 36 | 17.2% | |
5-6 times weekly | 9 | 4.3% | |
Daily | 13 | 6.2% | |
Preventive | Rest your eyes from time to time | 91 | 43.5% |
Reduce screen brightness | 157 | 75.1% | |
Adjust your devices to a comfortable level | 76 | 36.4% | |
Put some distance between you and the device | 61 | 29.2% |
Figures 1, 2 highlight the symptoms that participants found most bothersome. Eye dryness (43.2%), burning eyes (35.9%), and head and neck stiffness (31.1 %) as well as pain in the eye (27.7%) were the top three most bothersome symptoms.
Figure 1. Symptoms reported by the participants.
Figure 2. Most bothered symptoms to the participants.
Table 4 delves into the impact of digital eye straining on the quality of life. A significant proportion (74.2%) disagreed that DES increased stress levels in their daily lives, while 25.8% agreed. Regarding productivity, 46.9% agreed that the symptoms affected their ability to complete tasks. Additionally, 57.4% agreed that DES reduced their level of attention or concentration. Notably, 51.7% of participants who suffered from migraines or chronic headaches reported that these conditions worsened with prolonged device use. Daytime sleepiness (56.3%) and difficult sleep entry (58.3%) were the most prevalent sleep-related issues reported.
Table 4. Impact of digital eye straining on the quality of life.
N: Frequency of affected participants.
N%: Corresponding N in percentage form.
Impact on quality-of-life variables | N (total = 209) | N% (in percentage) | |
Digital eye strain increases the stress level in my daily life. | No | 155 | 74.2% |
Yes | 54 | 25.8% | |
The symptoms of digital eye strain affect my productivity and my ability to complete tasks. | Disagree | 30 | 14.4% |
Neutral | 81 | 38.8% | |
Agree | 98 | 46.9% | |
Digital eye strain increases the stress level in my daily life. | Disagree | 48 | 23.0% |
Neutral | 63 | 30.1% | |
Agree | 98 | 46.9% | |
Digital eye strain reduces my level of attention or concentration. | Disagree | 30 | 14.4% |
Neutral | 59 | 28.2% | |
Agree | 120 | 57.4% | |
Symptoms of digital eye strain greatly affect my driving. | Don’t have a car | 55 | 26.3% |
Disagree | 36 | 17.2% | |
Neutral | 53 | 25.4% | |
Agree | 65 | 31.1% | |
I feel that eye redness caused by digital stress is socially embarrassing. | Disagree | 88 | 42.1% |
Neutral | 64 | 30.6% | |
Agree | 57 | 27.3% | |
If you suffer from migraines or chronic headaches, do you get worse by using devices for long periods? | Disagree | 29 | 13.9% |
Neutral | 72 | 34.4% | |
Agree | 108 | 51.7% | |
The symptoms of digital eye strain affect the quality of my sleep. | Disagree | 64 | 30.6% |
Neutral | 49 | 23.4% | |
Agree | 96 | 45.9% |
The relationship between the severity of digital eye straining and various demographic factors was explored. Analysis revealed that there were no statistically significant differences in the number of reported symptoms based on gender (p = 0.333), educational level (p = 0.398), and total number of devices used daily (p = 0.298). However, age showed a statistically significant association (p = 0.002), with the 26-35 age group reporting higher severity. Significant associations were observed between the severity of digital eye straining and the number of hours spent using devices daily (p = 0.009). Participants using devices for more than eight hours a day reported higher symptom severity. Additionally, the use of the 20-20-20 rule showed a statistically significant association (p = 0.036), with those who never used the rule reporting more severe symptoms. A statistically significant association was found between studying using electronic devices and symptom severity (p = 0.011), with those who always studied using electronic devices reporting higher severity. Participants diagnosed with any eye disease reported a statistically significant association with symptom severity (p = 0.009) (Table 5).
Table 5. The relationship between the severity of digital eye straining and demographic factors.
N: Frequency of participants.
%: Percent of participants based on row count.
* Significant at p-value lower than 0.05.
Variables | Number of symptoms reported by the participants | |||||||||
No symptoms | 1-5 symptoms | 6-10 symptoms | >11 symptoms | P-value | ||||||
N | Row N % | N | Row N % | N | Row N % | N | Row N % | |||
Gender | Male | 2 | 5.3% | 28 | 73.7% | 8 | 21.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.333 |
Female | 3 | 1.8% | 112 | 65.5% | 55 | 32.2% | 1 | 0.6% | ||
Age (years) | 18-25 | 5 | 3.1% | 94 | 58.8% | 60 | 37.5% | 1 | 0.6% | 0.002* |
26-35 | 0 | 0.0% | 41 | 93.2% | 3 | 6.8% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
36-45 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Educational level | Diploma | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 80.0% | 1 | 20.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.398 |
Bachelor's | 5 | 2.7% | 121 | 64.4% | 61 | 32.4% | 1 | 0.5% | ||
Master | 0 | 0.0% | 15 | 93.8% | 1 | 6.3% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
What is the total number of devices you use daily (including phones, tablets, laptops, computers, etc.)? | One | 1 | 9.1% | 8 | 72.7% | 2 | 18.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.298 |
Two | 2 | 2.3% | 60 | 68.2% | 26 | 29.5% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Three | 2 | 2.4% | 55 | 64.7% | 28 | 32.9% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Four | 0 | 0.0% | 12 | 75.0% | 3 | 18.8% | 1 | 6.3% | ||
Five | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 60.0% | 2 | 40.0% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
6 or more | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
How many hours do you use your devices per day (total)? | 1-3 hours | 1 | 11.1% | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 22.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.009* |
3-6 hours | 0 | 0.0% | 39 | 90.7% | 4 | 9.3% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
6-8 hours | 2 | 2.3% | 58 | 66.7% | 26 | 29.9% | 1 | 1.1% | ||
More than 8 hours | 2 | 2.9% | 37 | 52.9% | 31 | 44.3% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Do you use the 20-20-20 rule (for every 20 minutes a person looks at the screen, they have to look at something 20 feet away for 20 seconds)? | Never | 5 | 4.7% | 60 | 56.1% | 41 | 38.3% | 1 | 0.9% | 0.036* |
Rarely | 0 | 0.0% | 18 | 60.0% | 12 | 40.0% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Sometimes | 0 | 0.0% | 46 | 83.6% | 9 | 16.4% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Usually | 0 | 0.0% | 13 | 92.9% | 1 | 7.1% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Always | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Do you study using electronic devices (iPad, tablet, Kindle, laptop, etc.)? | Never | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.011* |
Rarely | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Sometimes | 0 | 0.0% | 40 | 90.9% | 4 | 9.1% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Usually | 0 | 0.0% | 17 | 77.3% | 5 | 22.7% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Always | 5 | 3.7% | 74 | 55.2% | 54 | 40.3% | 1 | 0.7% | ||
Being diagnosed with any eye disease | Yes | 0 | 0.0% | 98 | 68.5% | 44 | 30.8% | 1 | 0.7% | 0.009* |
No | 5 | 7.6% | 42 | 63.6% | 19 | 28.8% | 0 | 0.0% |
The association between the severity of digital eye straining and its impact on various aspects of quality of life was investigated. A significant association was found between symptom severity and increased stress levels in daily life (p = 0.000). Participants reporting symptoms were more likely to experience elevated stress. The impact on productivity and the ability to complete tasks was also significantly associated with symptom severity (p = 0.022), with those reporting more symptoms being more affected. The association between symptom severity and reduced attention or concentration (p = 0.259), the impact on driving (p = 0.142), social embarrassment due to eye redness (p = 0.236), worsening migraines or chronic headaches (p = 0.122), and the effect on sleep quality (p = 0.015) was not statistically significant (Table 6).
Table 6. The relationship between the severity of digital eye straining and the quality of life.
N: Frequency of participants.
%: Percent of participants based on row count.
* Significant at p-value lower than 0.05.
Variables | Number of symptoms reported by the participants | |||||||||
No symptoms | 1-5 symptoms | 6-10 symptoms | >11 symptoms | P-value | ||||||
N | Column N % | N | Column N % | N | Column N % | N | Column N % | |||
Digital eye strain increases the stress level in my daily life. | No | 4 | 80.0% | 119 | 85.0% | 32 | 50.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.000* |
Yes | 1 | 20.0% | 21 | 15.0% | 31 | 49.2% | 1 | 100.0% | ||
The symptoms of digital eye strain affect my productivity and ability to complete tasks. | Disagree | 1 | 20.0% | 19 | 13.6% | 10 | 15.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.022* |
Neutral | 2 | 40.0% | 66 | 47.1% | 13 | 20.6% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Agree | 2 | 40.0% | 55 | 39.3% | 40 | 63.5% | 1 | 100.0% | ||
Digital eye strain reduces my level of attention or concentration. | Disagree | 2 | 40.0% | 22 | 15.7% | 6 | 9.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.259 |
Neutral | 1 | 20.0% | 44 | 31.4% | 14 | 22.2% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Agree | 2 | 40.0% | 74 | 52.9% | 43 | 68.3% | 1 | 100.0% | ||
Symptoms of digital eye strain greatly affect my driving. | Not having a car | 2 | 40.0% | 29 | 20.7% | 24 | 38.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.142 |
Disagree | 1 | 20.0% | 30 | 21.4% | 5 | 7.9% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Neutral | 1 | 20.0% | 39 | 27.9% | 13 | 20.6% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Agree | 1 | 20.0% | 42 | 30.0% | 21 | 33.3% | 1 | 100.0% | ||
I feel that eye redness caused by digital stress is socially embarrassing. | Disagree | 2 | 40.0% | 53 | 37.9% | 33 | 52.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.236 |
Neutral | 2 | 40.0% | 49 | 35.0% | 13 | 20.6% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Agree | 1 | 20.0% | 38 | 27.1% | 17 | 27.0% | 1 | 100.0% | ||
If you suffer from migraines or chronic headaches, do you get worse by using devices for long periods? | Disagree | 1 | 20.0% | 25 | 17.9% | 3 | 4.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.122 |
Neutral | 3 | 60.0% | 48 | 34.3% | 21 | 33.3% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Agree | 1 | 20.0% | 67 | 47.9% | 39 | 61.9% | 1 | 100.0% | ||
The symptoms of digital eye strain affect the quality of my sleep | Disagree | 2 | 40.0% | 46 | 32.9% | 16 | 25.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.015* |
Neutral | 3 | 60.0% | 38 | 27.1% | 8 | 12.7% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
Agree | 0 | 0.0% | 56 | 40.0% | 39 | 61.9% | 1 | 100.0% |
Discussion
The study delves into the realm of DES, starting with an exploration of the symptoms reported by the participants. Among the myriad symptoms, eye dryness, headache, and eye redness emerged as the most prevalent. These findings are consistent with established literature on DES symptoms [1,2,6,7]. These symptoms, along with others such as burning eyes, watery eyes, and itching eyes, collectively paint a vivid picture of the multifaceted impact of prolonged digital device usage on ocular health. Notably, participants also reported non-ocular symptoms like neck pain and increased sensitivity to light, emphasizing the systemic nature of the effects associated with DES [8,9].
Moving beyond the manifestation of symptoms, the study meticulously evaluates the severity of DES experienced by participants. The majority reported experiencing one to five symptoms, with only a small percentage indicating no symptoms. This spectrum of severity extends to those reporting six to 10 symptoms, while an even smaller group reported more than 11 symptoms. Understanding the distribution of symptom severity is essential for tailoring interventions and preventive strategies.
The study then navigates through the myriad factors that either contribute to or are affected by the severity of DES. Gender, educational level, and the number of daily devices used did not demonstrate statistically significant associations with symptom severity. This suggests that DES is a widespread issue affecting individuals across different educational backgrounds and genders. The lack of a significant association based on educational level contrasts with some studies linking higher education to increased screen time and digital device use [10,11]. In addition, some studies showed that female students were more affected by digital eye straining [6,12-14]. However, age emerged as a notable factor, with the 26-35 age group reporting higher severity compared to the 18-25 age group. This finding is in alignment with some studies that suggest older individuals may experience more symptoms due to age-related changes in eye physiology [2,8,15,16]. However, it aligns with the increasing trend of digital device usage among young adults, potentially contributing to higher symptom severity [17,18]. These findings challenge conventional notions that associate DES more closely with older age groups and suggest a nuanced interplay between age and technology-related behaviors.
Daily usage hours and adherence to the 20-20-20 rule exhibited statistically significant associations with symptom severity. Participants spending more than eight hours daily on devices reported higher symptom severity, underlining the role of prolonged exposure in the development of DES [2,19]. Similarly, those who never adhered to the 20-20-20 rule reported more severe symptoms, highlighting the potential protective nature of this rule [20,21].
The electronic device usage patterns reveal the ubiquity of technology in participants' lives. The most common number of daily devices used was two (42.1%), reflecting the multidevice usage trend in contemporary society. A significant majority (64.1%) reported always studying with electronic devices, emphasizing the integral role of technology in educational activities [22,23].
Entertainment (54.1%) and reading (59.8%) were identified as the primary uses of electronic devices. These findings align with broader societal trends where electronic devices serve not only as tools for work or study but also as sources of leisure and information [24].
The study also illuminates the association between studying using electronic devices and symptom severity. Participants who consistently studied with electronic devices reported higher severity, emphasizing the importance of considering educational practices in understanding and mitigating DES [6].
Further probing into the participants' health revealed intriguing associations. Individuals diagnosed with any eye disease exhibited a statistically significant link with symptom severity. This underscores the intricate relationship between pre-existing ocular conditions and the susceptibility to DES symptoms [19,25]. The association between migraines or chronic headaches and worsening symptoms with prolonged device use underscores the potential link between DES and broader health issues. Understanding these connections is crucial for comprehensive health management.
Intriguingly, the impact of DES on various aspects of quality of life was explored. While a significant proportion disagreed that DES increased stress levels, almost half agreed that the symptoms affected productivity and the ability to complete tasks. This suggests a complex interplay between the subjective experience of stress and the tangible effects on daily efficiency. The association between symptom severity and aspects like increased stress levels, reduced attention, and concentration was not statistically significant. This might indicate that individual differences, coping mechanisms, or external factors play a role in how DES manifests and impacts daily life [8,26].
Several limitations should be acknowledged. The study relied on self-reported data, introducing the possibility of recall bias. Objective measures, such as eye examinations, could provide more accurate information on eye health. Additionally, the cross-sectional design limits the establishment of causal relationships. Longitudinal studies tracking participants over time would offer insights into the progression of DES and its impact. Future research could delve into the effectiveness of specific interventions and preventive measures in mitigating DES symptoms. Exploring the role of factors like device ergonomics, blue light exposure, and individual visual habits could contribute to targeted interventions.
Conclusions
In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the prevalence, patterns, and impact of DES among a diverse group of participants. The findings underscore the multifaceted nature of DES, influenced by demographics, usage patterns, and health factors. Addressing DES requires a holistic approach encompassing awareness, preventive measures, and consideration of individual health contexts. This study contributes valuable insights into the evolving field of digital eye health and lays the foundation for further research and interventions.
Appendices
Table 7. Digital eye straining questionnaire.
CVS: Computer vision syndrome.
(A) Demographics |
Q1. Are you a university student in Riyadh? |
Yes (will move to the questions) |
No (The form will be submitted automatically) |
Q2. Basic information |
Age |
18–25 years |
26–35 years |
36–45 years |
Gender |
Female |
Male |
What college major are you studying in? |
Health-related specialties |
Science |
Computer sciences |
Engineering |
Arts and culture |
Business administration |
Social work |
Education |
Languages |
Community college |
Level of study |
Diploma |
Bachelor’s degree |
Master’s degree |
Doctorate |
(B) Prevalence (Insert CVS Q questionnaire here) |
a. Frequency |
b. Intensity burning |
Itching |
A feeling of a foreign body |
Tearing |
Excessive blinking |
Eye redness |
Eye pain |
Heavy eyelids |
Dryness |
Blurred vision |
Double vision |
Difficulty focusing for near vision |
Increased sensitivity to light |
Colored halos around objects |
Feeling that eyesight is worsening |
Headache |
(C) Associated factors |
How many devices do you use in total per day (including phones, tablets, laptops, and computers)? |
One |
Two |
Three |
Four |
Five |
More than 6 |
Do you study using electronic devices (iPads, tablets, kindle, laptops, etc.)? |
Always |
Usually |
Sometimes |
Rarely |
Never |
Are you diagnosed with any of the following eye diseases? |
Refractive errors |
Dry eye disease |
Amblyopia |
Uveitis |
Glaucoma |
Cataract |
Conjunctivitis |
Nonapplicable |
How many hours per day do you use your devices (total)? |
1-3 hrs |
3-6 hrs |
6-8 hrs |
More than eight hours |
Do you practice any of the following? |
Data analysis |
Programming |
Research |
Writing |
Tech-related tasks |
Data entry |
Reading on devices |
When using devices, do you do one of the following acts? |
Resting your eye from time to time |
Lower your screen brightness |
Putting a distance between you and the device |
Setting your devices on a comfortable level |
How many cups of caffeinated drinks (tea, coffee, energy, soft drinks) do you drink per day? |
None |
One |
Two |
Three |
More than four |
How many hours per day do you sleep? |
Less than four hours |
5-6 hrs |
6-8 hrs or more |
Do you use the 20-20-20 rule (For every 20 minutes a person looks at a screen, they should look at something 20 feet away for 20 seconds)? |
Always |
Usually |
Sometimes |
Rarely |
Never |
Do you use lubricating eye drops? |
Always |
Usually |
Sometimes |
Rarely |
Never |
Do you smoke, use Sheesha, or vape? |
Yes |
No |
(D) Common presentation |
When you use a device for a long time, what are the most frequent symptoms you suffer from (you can choose multiple answers)? |
Eye ache |
Tired eyes |
Burning |
Dryness |
Redness |
Tearing and irritation |
Blurred vision |
Double vision |
Shoulder pain |
Neck pain |
Neck stiffness and headache |
(E) Effects on quality of life |
Which of the following digital eye straining symptoms is most bothersome for you? |
Eye ache |
Tired eyes |
Burning |
Dryness |
Redness |
Tearing and irritation |
Blurred vision |
Double vision |
Shoulder pain |
Neck pain |
Neck stiffness and headache |
Digital eye straining symptoms are affecting my productivity and my ability to complete tasks. |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Digital eye straining increases my daily life stress level. |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
If you suffer from migraine or chronic headaches, is prolonged device exposure a trigger for your condition? |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Digital eye straining decreases my level of attention or concentration. |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Digital eye straining symptoms significantly affect the car driving experience. |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
When digital eye straining symptoms cause red eyes, it is socially embarrassing for me. |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Jehad Alabdulminaim Jr., Jana K. Abukhlaled, Halah O. Alamawi, Mohamed W. Bin Maneea
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Jehad Alabdulminaim Jr., Halah O. Alamawi, Abdulrahman Mohammed M. Aladawi, Asmaa Y. Alshangiti, Mohamed W. Bin Maneea
Drafting of the manuscript: Jana K. Abukhlaled, Ghadah Alsuwailem, Halah O. Alamawi, Abdulaziz Almuqbil, Mohamed W. Bin Maneea
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Ghadah Alsuwailem, Halah O. Alamawi, Abdulaziz Almuqbil, Abdulrahman Mohammed M. Aladawi, Asmaa Y. Alshangiti, Mohamed W. Bin Maneea
Supervision: Halah O. Alamawi, Mohamed W. Bin Maneea
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) issued approval HAP-01-R-059. The IRB has determined that your proposed project poses no more than minimal risk to the participants. Therefore, your proposal has been deemed EXEMPT from the IRB review.
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.The prevalence and knowledge of digital eye strain among the undergraduates in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Almudhaiyan TM, Aldebasi T, Alakel R, Marghlani L, Aljebreen A, Moazin OM. Cureus. 2023;15:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Digital eye strain-a comprehensive review. Kaur K, Gurnani B, Nayak S, et al. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022;11:1655–1680. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00540-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Effect of increased screen time on eyes during COVID-19 pandemic. Agarwal R, Tripathi A, Khan IA, Agarwal M. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11:3642–3647. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2219_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Computer vision syndrome: an ophthalmic pathology of the modern era. Pavel IA, Bogdanici CM, Donica VC, et al. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023;59:412. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the prevalence of computer vision syndrome among medical students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Almousa AN, Aldofyan MZ, Kokandi BA, Alsubki HE, Alqahtani RS, Gikandi P, Alghaihb SG. Int Ophthalmol. 2023;43:1275–1283. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02525-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Prevalence of digital eye strain among university students and its association with virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. AlQarni AM, AlAbdulKader AM, Alghamdi AN, Altayeb J, Jabaan R, Assaf L, Alanazi RA. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1755–1768. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S406032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Concurrent rising of dry eye and eye strain symptoms among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic era: a cross-sectional study. Uwimana A, Ma C, Ma X. http://of Dry Eye and Eye Strain Symptoms Among University. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022;15:2311–2322. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S388331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Digital eye strain: prevalence, measurement and amelioration. Sheppard AL, Wolffsohn JS. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2018;3:0. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Digital eye strain in young screen users: a systematic review. Mataftsi A, Seliniotaki AK, Moutzouri S, et al. Prev Med. 2023;170:107493. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Association between screen media use and academic performance among children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adelantado-Renau M, Moliner-Urdiales D, Cavero-Redondo I, Beltran-Valls MR, Martínez-Vizcaíno V, Álvarez-Bueno C. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173:1058–1067. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.The effect of lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic on digital eye strain symptoms among the general population: a cross-sectional survey. Abusamak M, Jaber HM, Alrawashdeh HM. https://journals.lww.com/ijo/Fulltext/2020/68110/Impact_of_the_COVID_19_lockdown_on_digital.15.aspx2. Front Public Health. 2022;10:895517. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.895517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Management of digital eye strain. Coles-Brennan C, Sulley A, Young G. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102:18–29. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on digital device-related ocular health. Bahkir FA, Grandee SS. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68:2378–2383. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2306_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Investigating the effect of eye cosmetics on the tear film: current insights. Wang MT, Craig JP. Clin Optom (Auckl) 2018;10:33–40. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S150926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Can nutrition play a role in ameliorating digital eye strain? Lem DW, Gierhart DL, Davey PG. Nutrients. 2022;14 doi: 10.3390/nu14194005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ageing changes in the eye. Salvi SM, Akhtar S, Currie Z. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82:581–587. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.040857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Increased screen time as a cause of declining physical, psychological health, and sleep patterns: a literary review. Nakshine VS, Thute P, Khatib MN, Sarkar B. Cureus. 2022;14:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Adolescent development and growing divides in the digital age. Odgers CL, Jensen MR. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020;22:143–149. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/codgers. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Association between time spent on smartphones and digital eye strain: a 1-year prospective observational study among Hong Kong children and adolescents. Chu GC, Chan LY, Do CW, et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30:58428–58435. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26258-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.20-20-20 Rule: are these numbers justified? Johnson S, Rosenfield M. Optom Vis Sci. 2023;100:52–56. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Population perceived eye strain due to digital devices usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Almalki AM, Alblowi M, Aldosari AM, Khandekar R, Al-Swailem SA. Int Ophthalmol. 2023;43:1935–1943. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02593-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.The role of technology-based education and teacher professional development in English as a foreign language classes. Zhang W. Front Psychol. 2022;13:910315. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Digital technologies: students' expectations and experiences during their transition from high school to university. Keane T, Linden T, Hernandez-Martinez P, Molnar A, Blicblau A. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) 2023;28:857–877. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11184-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Technologies and social services. An overview of technology use by users of social services. Moreno RM, Borrero MF, Fuentevilla EF, Medina FR, Luchena AM, Aguado OV. PLoS One. 2023;18:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.TFOS lifestyle: impact of the digital environment on the ocular surface. Wolffsohn JS, Lingham G, Downie LE, et al. Ocul Surf. 2023;28:213–252. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.A web-based cross-sectional survey on eye strain and perceived stress amid the COVID-19 online learning among medical science students. Victor VM, Parsan A, Dookran A, et al. Int Med Educ. 2023;2:83–95. [Google Scholar]