Skip to main content
. 2024 May 31;15:153. doi: 10.1186/s13287-024-03766-5

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies

First author Year Trials’
name
Patients (n) Median age,
year (range)
Median follow-up,
month (range)
FAB type Experiment
group (CRi)
Control
group (CRi)
Experiment(n)/
Control(n)
Marilyn L. Slovak 2000 E3489/S9034 129 39 (16–55) 60 (NA) M0-M6

Allo-SCT†

(CR1)

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

66/63

Stefan

Suciu

2003 EORTC/GIMEMAAML−10 288

T: 33 (15–45)

C: 35 (15–45)

48 (NA) M0-M7

Allo-SCT†

(donor, CR1)

Auto-SCT

(no donor, CR1)

111/177

Eric

Jourdan

2005 BGMT 299

T: 34 (15–45)

C: 33.5 (15–45)

114 (29–222) M0-M7

Allo-SCT†

(donor, CR1)

Auto-SCT

(no donor, CR1)

110/189
Markus Pfirrmann 2012 AML96 260 46 (15–60) 36 (NA)

M0-M2,

M4-M7

Allo-SCT†

(CR)

Auto-SCT

(CR)

117/143
Markus Pfirrmann* 2012 AML2003 141 49 (39–55) 36 (NA) M0-M2 M4-M7

Allo-SCT†

(CR)

Auto-SCT

(CR)

109/32

Ki-Seong

Eom

2015 NA 59 36.0 (16–64) 60.9 (50.0−71.9) NA

Allo-SCT‡

(CR1)

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

30/29

Jia

Chen

2018 NA 195

T: 28 (16–42)

C: 34 (24–45)

33 (NA) NA

Haplo-SCT

(CR1)

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

107/88

Frederic

Baron

2020

EORTC/GIMEMA

AML−10

497

T: 33 (15–45)

C: 35 (15–45)

132 (NA) M0-M7

Allo-SCT†

(donor, CR)

Auto-SCT

(no donor, CR)

185/312
Jean-Luc Harousseau 1997 GOELAM 164 36 (15–50) 62 (NA) M0-M7

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

CT 86/78
Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou 2003 AML8 34 NA (15–50) 55 (33–64)

M0-M2,

M4-M6

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

CT 19/15
Dimitri A. Breems 2005

HOVON/

SAKK AML4

130 43 (NA) 154 (NA) M0-M6

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

CT 66/64

Edo

Vellenga

2011

AML−29

AML−42

447

T: 49 (16–61)

C: 47 (16–61)

106 (13–177) M0-M2 M4-M7

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

CT 231/216

Romain

Guieze

2012 GOELAMS LAM−2001 31 47 (18–60) 86 (16–118) M0-M2 M4-M7

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

CT 21/10

Kensuke

Usuki

2012 NA 1212

T:48 (16–70)

C:52 (16–70)

50 (0.2–116 ) M0-M2 M4-M7

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

CT 75/1137
Marie-Anne Hospital 2014

ALFA−9801

ALFA−9802 LAM−2001

CBF−2006

67 43 (16–76) 42 (NA) NA

Auto-SCT

(CR2)

CT 18/49

Toshihiro

Miyamoto

2017 NA 87

T: 46.5 (18–63)

C: 48 (19–64)

T: 55.1 (3.7−147.9)

C: 61.1 ( 4.0−142.0)

M1, M2, M4, M5

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

CT 42/45

Adriano

Venditti

2019 GIMEMA AML1310 117 49 (18–60) 28.8 (NA) M0-M2 M4-M7

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

CT 19/98

Eun‑Ji

Choi

2021 NCT01050036 42 40 (19−60) 55.2 (NA) NA

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

CT 29/13

RF

Schlenk

2003 AML HD93 73 46 (16–60) 64 (NA) M0-M2 M4-M7

Allo-SCT†

(CR1)

CT 16/57
Hisashi Sakamaki 2010 AML97 165

T: 37 (16–50)

C: 36 (15–50)

NA (3.1−105.8) M0-M2 M4-M7

Allo-SCT†

(donor, CR)

CT

(no donor)

73/92

Xiao-Jun

Huang

2012 NA 122

T: 30 (16–47)

C: 47 (15–60)

19 ( 4–63) M0-M2 M4-M7

Haplo-SCT

(CR1)

CT 52/70
Richard F. Schlenk 2013

HOVON

/SAKK

AMLSG

92

104

44 (16–60) 62 (NA) M0-M2 M4-M6

Auto-SCT

Allo-SCT†

(CR1)

CT

20/72

32/72

Hong-Hu

Zhu

2013 AML05 69 33 (15–56) 36 (6–83 ) NA

Allo-SCT£

(CR1)

CT 40/29

Matthias

Stelljes

2014 AMLCG99 288

T:45 (16–59)

C:46 (17–59)

144 (NA) M0-M2 M4-M7

Allo-SCT‡

(CR1)

CT 144/144
K. Heidrich 2017

AML2003

AML96

246 48 (39–55) 72 (NA) M0-M2 M4-M7

Allo-SCT‡

(CR)

CT 97/149
Wasithep Limvorapitak 2018 NA 190 NA(18–65) 104.4 (25.2−181.2) NA

Allo-SCT†

Allo-SCT§

Auto-SCT

(CR1)

CT

62/80

18/80

30/80

Meng

Lv

2018 NA 147

T:30 (16–58)

C:44 (21–60)

48.6 (36.1–88.5) M0-M2 M4-M6

Haplo-SCT

(CR1)

CT 78/69

Adam

Folta

2019 NA 116 54 (19–72) NA M0-M2 M4-M7

Allo-SCT

(NA)

CT 74/42

Nigel H.

Russell

2021 AML16 728 NA (60–70) 60 (NA) M0-M2 M4-M7

Allo-SCT‡

(CR)

CT 122/728
Martin Bornhauser 2023 NCT01246752 143

T: 50.5 (19.0–60.0)

C: 51.0 (24.0–60.0)

50 (48–66) M0-M2 M4-M7

Allo-SCT‡

(CR1)

CT 76/67

Note Allo-SCT†: HLA-identical sibling donor; Allo-SCT‡: HLA-matched donor; Allo-SCT£: The donor of more than 50% patients in the group was HLA-matched; Allo-SCT§: Non-related donors, including HLA-mismatched and matched; Markus Pfirrmann *:Data sourced from supplementary materials; Jean-Luc Harousseau 1997: The non-high-risk patients accounted for 88%; Dimitri A. Breems 2005: The non-high-risk patients accounted for 92%; Stefan Suciu 2003: The study was divided into the donor group and the non-donor group, but over 70% patients of the donor group underwent allo-SCT, and over 60% patients of the non-donor group underwent auto-SCT; Eric Jourdan 2005: 94% of patients in the donor group underwent allo-SCT, and 62% of patients in the non-donor group received auto-SCT; Hisashi Sakamaki 2010: More than half of patients in the donor group underwent allo-SCT, with over 87% patients having an intermediate-risk classification Frederic Baron 2020: 71% of patients in the donor group underwent allo-SCT, and 53% of patients in the non-donor group received auto-SCT; Abbreviation T, treatment group; C, control group; NA, not available; CT, chemotherapy; CR, complete remission; allo-SCT, allogenic stem cell transplantation; auto-SCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; haplo-SCT, haploidentical stem cell transplantation; FAB, French-American-British