Skip to main content
. 2024 May 20;10(10):e31569. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31569

Table 7.

Additive and multiplicative interaction effect analysis of variance of AMMI model for MRY, DW, BC and VC of 11 sweet potato genotypes.

MRY
Source of variations df MSS F value Proportional variance Cumulative variance
Environment 2 997.84 575.82***
Error I 6 1.73 0.72ns
Genotype 10 250.08 103.66***
GEI 20 48.30 20.02***
PC1 11 68.58 28.43*** 78.10 78.10
PC2 9 23.53 9.75*** 21.90 100
Error II 60 2.41
Total 118 55.79
DW
Environment 2 12.27066 5.438277*
Error I 6 2.25635 0.832957ns
Genotype 10 215.7566 79.64898***
GEI 20 7.727743 2.852783***
PC1 11 12.96968 4.79*** 92.3 92.3
PC2 9 1.32093 0.49ns 7.7 100
Error II 60 2.708844
Total 118 22.60412
BC
Environment 2 3.698079 0.464182ns
Error I 6 7.966866 1.811431ns
Genotype 10 982.9968 223.5046***
GEI 20 26.88329 6.112471***
PC1 11 48.38155 11*** 99 99
PC2 9 0.60764 0.14ns 1 100
Error II 60 4.398105
Total 118 95.12189
VC
Environment 2 9.334455 6.633173*
Error I 6 1.407238 0.411242ns
Genotype 10 222.2501 64.94883***
GEI 20 12.99844 3.798574***
PC1 11 23.45776 6.86*** 99.3 99.3
PC2 9 0.21482 0.06ns 0.7 100
Error II 60 3.421926
Total 118 25.21073

***significant at p < 0.001, ** significant at p < 0.01, * significant at p < 0.05, NS non-significant, MRY marketable storage root yield (t/ha), DW dry weight of storage roots (%), BC beta-carotene content (mg/100g) and VC vitamin C content (mg/100g).