Table 1.
Author/year | Country | SPA Type | Diagnosis criteria used | Study design | Sample size (n) | Gender (M/F) | Age | Anatomical site | Definition |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Petcharat et al. (2021) [22] | Thailand | AS and PsA |
|
Cross-Sectional |
|
171/148 | 45.5 (12.2) | Cervical and lumbar spine | ‘Syndesmophyte was defined as bone growth originating from the vertebral endplate in the anterior one-quarter of the discovertebral space or from the anterior vertebral cortex’ |
Gonzalez-Lopez et al. (2017) [10] | Mexico | AS | New York criteria | Prospective/case–control | 89 | 57/32 | 44.3 (11.4)a | Cervical/Lumbar | ‘Syndesmophytes were defined as bony protuberances associated with ossification of the spinal ligaments without involvement of the intervertebral discs’. |
De Bruin et al. (2016) [35] | Netherlands | AxSpA | ASAS | Cross-sectional | 274 | 96/178 | 28.2 (9)a | All | ‘The differentiation between osteophytes and syndesmophytes is based on the site of origin and the angle between the bony spur and the vertebral endplate; syndesmophytes originate at the ligamentous insertion and have a more vertical configuration’. |
Gamez-Nava et al. (2016) [11] | Mexico | AS | New York criteria | Case–control | 78 | 50/28 | Cervical/Lumbar | ‘Syndesmophytes were defined according to the presence of ossification of vertebral ligaments of > 5 mm in radiographs’. | |
Baraliakos et al. (2014) [36] | Germany | AS | N/A | Cross-sectional | 73 | 63/10 | 40.5 (10.5)a | Cervical/Lumbar | ‘Assessment of syndesmophytes and differentiation from degenerative changes such as spondylophytes was made according to a recent proposal, where the former are considered by showing a growth parallel to the anterior vertebral side/anterior intervertebral ligament while the latter are considered by showing a growth parallel to the horizontal line’. |
Haddad et al. (2013) [5] | Canada | PsA | CasparS | Prospective cohort | 78 | 57/21 | 62.9 (8.9)a | Cervical/Lumbar | ‘PsA-related changes (syndesmophytes) were considered if there was a growth angle of < 45° to the anterior vertebral side, while an angle > 45 was considered to be osteophytes’. |
Baraliakos 2012 [37] | Germany | AS | mNew York criteria | Retrospective cohort | 146 | 81/65 | 54.2 (12.3)a | Cervical/Lumbar | ‘Measuring the horizontal angle of new bone formation on lateral spinal radiographs, AS-related changes (syndesmophytes) were assumed to typically show a growth angle of ≤ 45° to the anterior vertebral side, while a growth angle of > 45° was assumed to represent more DISH-related changes (spondylophytes)’. |
Maejima et al. (2010) [23] | Japan | PsA | Caspar | Cross-sectional | 25 | 18/7 | N/A | All |
|
Chandran et al. (2009) [24] | Canada | PsA | N/A | Retrospective cohort | 297 | 169/128 | 42.5a | All |
|
Baraliakos 2007 [38] | Germany | AS | mNew York criteria | Prospective | 116 | N/A | 38.4a | All | ‘Bony changes with an angle ≤45° to the anterior vertebral side were defined as syndesmophytes, in contrast with changes with an angle of >45°, which were defined as ambiguous syndesmophytes’. |
Helliwell et al. (1998) [25] | UK |
|
|
|
AS: 46a IBD = 48 PsA = 46 ReA = 43 | All |
|
||
Hanly et al. (1988) [26] | Canada | PsA | NA | Cross-sectional | 52 | 30/22 |
|
All |
|
Mean (s.d.).
Median.
SpA: Spondyloarthritis; AxSpA: Axial Spondyloarthritis; ASAS: Assessment of Spondylo Arthritis International Society; ReA: Reactive arthritis; N/A: Not applicable.